Monday, February 28, 2011

John Simpson in Libya: Gaddafi was mad, bad and dangerous to know

John Simpson in Libya: Gaddafi was mad, bad and dangerous to know

Five rocks in a line on the tarmac made a minimal roadblock, and two men with broom handles as weapons guarded the road into eastern Libya, stamping their feet in the freezing rain.

There has inevitably been enormous corruption in Gaddafi's Libya: a small, impenetrable elite and a closed system always ensure that. But Libya has been cursed with his absurdity and foolishness of their leader as well.

There has inevitably been enormous corruption in Gaddafi's Libya. But Libya has been cursed with the absurdity and foolishness of their leader as well Photo: REUTERS

By John Simpson, BBC World Affairs Editor 8:00AM GMT 27 Feb 2011

Brown teeth flashed in a genuine grin, and one of them shouted: "Engilisi very good!"

Behind him, on a small roadside obelisk which might once have carried a picture of Col Muammar Gaddafi, hung a long-hidden red, green and black banner decorated with a silver star and crescent moon. It was the national flag of the old kingdom of Libya, which was overthrown in the coup launched on Sept 1 1969 by the young Colonel. Now, after 41 years in hiding, the flag is back. And the Colonel is being overthrown.

It was very much like being back in the revolutionary year of 1989, driving across the Yugoslav/Romanian border immediately after Ceausescu's fall from power: the air of improvisation, the sheer unexpected delight at being free of a repressive regime which had lasted so long that everyone thought it was permanent.

And there was the symbolism of the flag. In Romania they cut the Communist symbols out, so the old tricolor flew everywhere with a jagged hole in its centre; here, they brought the old flag out of hiding places and hung them up.

It was an act of restitution, a symbolic eradication of everything Col Gaddafi's crazy rule has tried to establish. But, as in Ceausescu's Romania, it will take decades to restore the immense waste, and the loss and outright theft of the nation's patrimony.

Libya is an empty country: an enormous section of North Africa containing only six million people. Divide the trillions which the country's oil had produced since the early 1970s by six million and everyone here should be a multi-millionaire. Not so. Libya may not be dirt poor like Sudan or Yemen, but the comfortable capitalism of Morocco, Tunisia and Egypt is entirely missing. Even Algeria seems richer.

The stony desert is dotted with roofless, uncompleted houses. In the occasional small towns along the road the solitary shop will sell only the cheapest Chinese plastic goods and the kind of low-quality comestibles which are dumped on poor countries. The televisions that locals crowd around are elderly and the picture quality is bad.

There has inevitably been enormous corruption in Gaddafi's Libya: a small, impenetrable elite and a closed system always ensure that. But Libya has been cursed with his absurdity and foolishness as well. In the 1980s he abolished shops, and seriously considered abolishing money as well. The market economy, the cash nexus, was to be destroyed.

Those were the days of the Little Green Book and the Great SPLAJ, as it was officially known: the Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, or republic. Economic activity virtually collapsed, and the vast hypermarkets which the Great SPLAJ ordained for the outskirts of every town and village stayed stubbornly empty. A genuine fear of starvation briefly caught hold, in a country that notionally had one of the highest GDPs on earth. After that the Little Green Book, a largely illiterate set of economic ideas, half Mao and half Pol Pot, was forgotten.

On our journey east to Benghazi we saw the effects of all this: the reasonably well-educated but wholly unemployed young men discussing impractical schemes for their revolution, the nervous older men, glad at the thought they might be free of Col Gaddafi at last, yet afraid he might return.

Yet Ceausescu's Romania had these things too. In April 1989 I toured round it and came to the conclusion that the very instinct for liberty had been crushed out of the population; yet eight months later they chased Ceausescu and his Lady Macbeth-like wife out of power and riddled them with bullets. You don't, I learnt then, eradicate the desire for freedom that easily.

Since my first visit to Libya in 1978, when Col Gaddafi had the aura of revolutionary chic about him, I have been back here nine times: sometimes a welcome guest, sometimes a pariah to be held in my hotel room for days at a time.

Whenever I met him, there was never any doubt that his mind was deeply disturbed. He could be pleasant, in a distant, dismissive kind of way, but he never made eye-contact.

Once, when I sat in his famous multicoloured tent, he threw his head back and laughed uproariously every time I asked him a question; then brought his head down again to look at me without the trace of even a smile. The effect was so disturbing that the producer and I considered editing out the manic laughter. Yet that, aside from the ethical implications, made him seem even weirder. The laughter stayed, and the viewers were bemused.

In August 1980 he summoned some of the world's best-known journalists to a press conference, kept them waiting for days, then appeared dressed like Sherlock Holmes in a Burberry ulster. He wandered through the crowd, greeting people, though again without looking them in the eye. At the other end of the room the door opened and he slipped through it. In the silence which fell we could hear the key turn in the lock. That was it: there would be no press conference after all.

In 1998, when the outside world started to demand that Libya deliver the men accused of carrying out the Lockerbie bombing, I was again invited to Tripoli. Col Gaddafi appeared wearing a straw trilby-like hat, sideways on. Sitting down, he flicked away the flies with a whisk in a gesture that looked as though he were ritually whipping himself. Throughout our 40-minute interview he would lift himself out of his chair and break wind, loudly enough to be heard on the soundtrack. When I wrote about it afterwards for this newspaper, the then editor gave the article the headline "Warm Wind Of Compromise Blows From Gaddafi". But there was a price to be paid for committing lèse-majesté. I was never given another visa to Libya, and near my home in London I was followed, screamed at and attacked by a man of Arab appearance.

With hindsight, it seems unwise of Tony Blair to have tried to present Col Gaddafi as a statesman with whom Britain should do business. In Benghazi today, where leading figures in the resistance have British links, there is a baffled anger that a figure of international prominence should have accorded Col Gaddafi so much respect.

There is of course a parallel: Jim Callaghan twisting the Queen's arm back in 1978 to award Nicolae Ceausescu an honorary knighthood. Departures from strict principle usually punish the expediency of the moment.

When the revolution came in Romania, literally no one supported the Ceausescus. Even their bodyguards abandoned them. Col Gaddafi still has the backing, reluctant or otherwise, of several thousand soldiers and a similar number of political followers in Tripoli. Elsewhere, though, his support has completely evaporated; there are reports that his own tribe has disowned him. But the disturbing possibility of a Götterdämmerung in his bunker, his sons around him, remains.

That, certainly, is the expectation of one man who has spent almost his entire life in Col Gaddafi's service. Gen Abdel Fatteh Younis, who until last Tuesday was Libya's interior minister and the commander of its special forces, has known Col Gaddafi since 1964. Gen Younis was involved in the coup five years later, and has been part of the regime ever since. He now supports the revolution, having (he says) been converted by so much bloodshed, and believes Col Gaddafi will die fighting. He is also certain that the Colonel is mentally unhinged. "He takes very dangerous decisions in a state of anger," he told me. "It's impossible to think he's completely sane."

In 1998 Col Gaddafi published Escape to Hell and Other Stories, a volume of remarkably gloomy short stories. One describes him wandering the streets being pestered by people who want him to provide them with things – radios, televisions, washing machines and (more oddly) cats or dogs. He calls this lonely figure "a poor benighted Bedouin".

Libya as it is today, poverty-stricken, churned up by violence, disregarded in the world at large except for its oil, has been created in Col Gaddafi's own weird image. For 41 years a particularly nasty secret police has kept him in power. Characters like Gen Younis were prepared to go along with him because it was worth their while, and because it was too dangerous to go against him.

Now Col Gaddafi's short story has come true. In my hotel in Benghazi they put posters of him on the floor for people to walk on. Power and strength are being stripped away from him, day by day, and he is little more than the poor benighted Bedouin of his own imaginings.

The tragedy is that the exercise of his fantasies has damaged this rich, biddable, pleasant country for decades to come.

John Simpson is the BBC's World Affairs Editor.

The Telegraph

Sunday, February 27, 2011

: Belgium: Halal beer

Belgium: Halal beer

Translated from HLN:

Sultane, a halal kriek beer produced by Caulier, a brewery from Péruwelz in Henegouwen, will be available in Belgium in the upcoming weeks. The beer is targeted at Muslims, reports La Capitale. This is the first malted drink - not beer - with a halal certificate in Europe. An Algerian imam certified Sultane. The halal beer will be available also in France, and contacts have been made to offer it in the UK, Tunisia, Germany and Kuwait.


View article...

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Muslim 'refused job because of his name' accuses airline bosses of racism

UK: Muslim 'refused job because of his name' accuses airline bosses of racism

Via the Daily Mail:

A Muslim airport worker has accused airline Cathay Pacific of racism after he was refused a job interview – only to be offered one when he applied two days later using a fake white British-sounding name.

Algerian-born Salim Zakhrouf applied to Cathay Pacific for a job as a passenger services officer at Heathrow Airport.

Mr Zakhrouf, 38, who has lived in Britain since 1991 and is a UK citizen, was told by email he had not been selected for interview.

But applying 48 hours later as 'Ian Woodhouse' with an identical CV and home address, he was invited for an interview by the same personnel officer who had first refused him.

(source)

 

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Malta: Libyan air force pilots seek asylum

 

Malta: Libyan air force pilots seek asylum

Via AP:

Two Libyan air force jets landed in Malta on Monday and their pilots asked for political asylum amid a bloody crackdown on anti-government protesters in Libya, a military source said.

The two Mirage jets landed at Malta International Airport shortly after two civilian helicopters landed carrying seven people who said they were French. A military source familiar with the situation said the passengers had left in such a hurry that only one had a passport.

(source)

 

Sunday, February 20, 2011

Poland: Muslim community leaders honored on 85th anniversary

 

 

Poland: Muslim community leaders honored on 85th anniversary


Via Polskie Radio:

Marking the 85th anniversary of the Muslim Religious Association in Poland, President Komorowski has decorated prominent representatives of the community.

Tatars have lived on the territory of the old Commonwealth of Poland and Lithuania for many centuries. A community of approximately 4000 still endures in a cluster of villages in eastern Poland.

Amongst those honoured today were the Chief Mufti of Poland, Tomasz Miskiewicz, and 100 year-old imam Stefan Jasinski.

Komorowski noted today at the ceremony in the Presidential Palace that the decorations recalled a time in Poland of "great tolerance, and an ability to arrange relations between faiths, cultures and languages."

(source)

 

Spiritual Luminance and Islamic Manners

Spiritual Luminance and Islamic Manners

Please send us an e-mail to unsubscribe!

Saturday, February 19, 2011

 

People of wisdom state:

The sun radiates heat and light to everybody. People make use of them and continue living. Though all beings on earth benefit from the sun, it never says, “You warm up thanks to me, and it is I that provide you with light.” So is the case with Islamic superiors. Though they emit fayd [outpouring that flow from the guide’s heart to a heart, which thus gains motion, purity, and exaltation] to the whole world, they use such expressions as “This weak person” or “This faqir [the one who recognizes his complete dependence on Allah in all of his affairs]” or “We are nothing” to refer to themselves. We, Muslims who hold the creed of Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jama’ah, know the Sun [the spiritual guide showing the path]. Furthermore, we know such suns as Shah-i Naqshband, Imam-i Rabbani, and Mawlana Khalid-i Baghdadi. We owe everything we have, including our faith, to these superiors. If we had not known them, how would our lives be now? We would be worse than other people. 

Our Master the Prophet stated, “Mercy descends where the pious are mentioned.” From this mercy, a person whose pot is completely open gets much, and another person whose pot is slightly open gets a little. However, the one whose pot is upside down does not get any. The coming of mercy and fayd is beyond the power of humans.

 

The coming of fayd

Fayd is like sunbeams and it sends light everywhere. Fayd certainly flows from those superiors. Receiving or not receiving it is within the power of humans. In fact, fayd comes up to the level of the chest, but there are some requirements to be fulfilled in order for it to gain access:

1. To believe that fayd is coming,

2. To have a firm belief in the greatness of the person from whom the fayd flows,

3. To love the person from whom fayd flows, that is, to be obedient to what he instructs,

4. To perform obligatory religious duties and to abstain from forbidden things,

5. To be respectful and well mannered toward that person to the utmost. This last requirement is the most important and the most difficult one because it is stated that anyone who does not observe [the Islamic manners called] aadaab cannot win the pleasure of Allahu ta’ala, nor can he become His friend.

In this context, Hadrat Imam-i Rabbani said:

“Among all kinds of acts of worship and perfections that bring one closer to Allahu ta’ala, suhbah [being in the presence of a spiritual guide and his delivering religious speeches and their being listened to by those in attendance] is ranked first, but its condition is heavy. This condition is the adherence to the manners. If one transgresses the manners by as much as an atom’s weight, one cannot derive benefit.”

 

Obeying orders and manners

Manners are two kinds: (1) to know one’s place; (2) to obey orders, to perform what one is told. Our religious superiors stated, “Al amr-u fawq al-adab.” That is, obeying an order is above observing manners because following an order is the highest of good manners.

The essence of the path of Islamic superiors is manners. We may do excellent and highly beneficial deeds, but they are of no avail, of no use if they have not been done in compliance with manners. As a matter of fact, Hadrat Shah-i Naqshband declared, “The essence, the beginning, the middle, and the end of this path is manners.”

 

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Police smash fake deportation operatives

Police smash fake deportation operatives

By SULTAN AL-TAMIMI | ARAB NEWS

 

JEDDAH: Five Indian nationals were recently arrested in Jeddah on suspicion of running a fake deportation service for overstayers under the King Fahad Bridge in the Baba Makkah area of the city.

 

The group was led by a 40-year-old man who tried to escape during a police raid on his hideout. He was, however, arrested. “The suspect along with his group used to visit overstayers under the King Fahad Bridge and would attempt to take advantage of them by presenting himself as a deportation broker,” said Col. Misfer Al-Juaid, spokesman for Jeddah police.
“Group members used to tell overstayers that they could arrange their deportation for a large fee using connections inside Jeddah’s deportation center. They would say they could arrange the deportation without them having to pay fines or face penalties,” said Al-Juaid.


Police caught on to the group’s activities following reports from undercover police officers who were implanted among the overstayers. The undercover officers were able to gather all necessary information about the five men.
“A police raid was carried out on their location which resulted in the arrest of one of the suspects. This led to the rest of the group’s arrest. Officers also found SR420,0000 inside the house,” said Al-Juaid.

 

Saturday, February 12, 2011

BBC News - Egypt crisis: Jubilation as President Mubarak departs

BBC News - Egypt crisis: Jubilation as President Mubarak departs
Fireworks lit the skies of Cairo and protesters shed tears of joy in Egypt as they celebrated the end of President Hosni Mubarak's 30 years of power
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/

Importance of Islamic Manners

Importance of Islamic Manners

People of wisdom state:

Anyone who does not observe (Islamic manners called) aadaab cannot win
Allahu ta'ala's love and pleasure. Nor can he become His dear slave.
The path of Islamic superiors, from beginning to end, is built upon
manners. Knowledge is not learned before manners are learned. Good
manners are the source of fayd (spiritual power that flows from heart
to heart and helps one obey Allahu ta'ala's commandments) because fayd
flow to a well-mannered person, not an ill-mannered one. Islam is good
manners and modesty. Good manners are the gateway, and modesty comes
after them. Besides, morals and manners are external manifestations of
wisdom because one's level of wisdom is directly proportional to one's
firmness in practicing Islamic manners and etiquette. Adab (sing. of
aadaab) means considering oneself imperfect and knowing one's place.
In fact, the highest knowledge is to know one's place.

Three kinds of manners to be observed

1. There are manners to be observed toward Allahu ta'ala. That is, one
must be a servant to Him both inwardly and outwardly, performing all
of His commandments and abstaining from all of His prohibitions.

2. There are manners to be observed toward our Master the Messenger of
Allah. One must follow him in belief, actions, and manners.

3. There are also manners to be observed toward one's spiritual guide
because the guide has acted as an intermediary for one to obey our
Master the Prophet. Therefore, one should never ever forget his
master.

Allahu ta'ala forgives the sins and wrongdoings committed against
Himself when repentance is made. However, He does not forgive those
that are committed against His Beloved (our Prophet). He is jalis-i
ilahi. That is, he is with Allahu ta'ala. So is the case with other
Islamic superiors, like Hadrat Imam-i Rabbani, who are our Prophet's
inheritors. Upsetting them, therefore, causes disastrous consequences,
so one must strictly avoid it. Notable Islamic figures stated, "I
benefited from my spiritual guide thanks to my good manners alone."

Once upon a time, while a teacher named Mullah 'Abdullah, together
with his two students, was traveling to Nehri (a village in Hakkari,
Turkey) to visit Hadrat Sayyid Taha al-Hakkari, one of the superiors
of the Silsila-i 'Aliyya, they sat by a brook. Mullah 'Abdullah said
to his students, "Because a great person lives in Nehri, everybody
goes there by performing an ablution. I will break this custom and go
there without an ablution." Though his students tried to convince him,
saying, "Sir, let us not break this custom. Let us go there by
performing an ablution," Mullah 'Abdullah replied, "Is it an Islamic
commandment? I will not do it." Sometime later, while he was washing
his hands and face to cool himself off, his staff fell into the water.
At the time he stretched out his hand to take it, the staff hit him on
the head and in the face, leaving his face and eyes covered in blood.
Then the staff disappeared. Thereupon, he deeply regretted uttering
those words. Having bandaged his injured parts, he made an ablution
and went to Nehri. When he entered the convent of Hadrat Sayyid Taha,
he saw that that staff was hung on the wall. As his eyes were fixed on
the staff, Hadrat Sayyid Taha stated, "What is the matter? Are you
looking at this staff because it beat you?" Filled with remorse,
Mullah 'Abdullah repented of what he had done and was honored with
becoming a student of his.

Paris: Tunisian revolution figure Bouazizi to be memorialized

Paris: Tunisian revolution figure Bouazizi to be memorialized

Via M&C:

City councillors in the French capital Paris on Tuesday unanimously adopted a proposal to name a street, square or other site after Mohammed Bouazizi, the Tunisian vegetable vendor whose protest suicide sparked that country's Jasmine Revolution.

The proposal had been brought forward by Tunisian-born Mayor Bertrand Delanoe.

(source)

 

Friday, February 11, 2011

President Hosni Mubarak ofEgypt turned over all power to the military


By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK, ANTHONY SHADID and ALAN COWELL

CAIRO — President Hosni Mubarak ofEgypt turned over all power to the military, and left the Egyptian capital for his resort home in Sharm el-Sheik, Vice President Omar Suleimanannounced on state television on Friday.

The announcement, delivered during evening prayers in Cairo, set off a frenzy of celebration, with protesters shouting "Egypt is free!"

The Egyptian military issued acommuniqué pledging to carry out a variety of constitutional reforms in a statement notable for its commanding tone. The military's statement alluded to the delegation of power to Mr. Suleiman and it suggested that the military would supervise implementation of the reforms.

David D. Kirkpatrick and Anthony Shadid reported from Cairo, and Alan Cowell from Paris. Reporting was contributed by Kareem Fahim, Liam Stack, Mona El-Naggar and Thanassis Cambanis from Cairo, and Sheryl Gay Stolberg from Marquette, Mich.

Sweden: Immigrants feel less safe, more likely to become crime victims, than Swedes

Sweden: Immigrants feel less safe, more likely to become crime victims, than Swedes

Via the Local:

One in four immigrants doesn't feel safe in Sweden, according to a new study. In general, however, Swedes feel safer than in years past.

More crimes are committed against immigrants in Sweden as a group, the annual national survey of safety compiled by the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (Brottsförebyggande rådet – Brå) has found.

The survey (Nationella trygghetsundersökning – NTU), also found immigrants have less confidence in the Swedish judicial system and feel less safe than the general population.

(source)

 

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Egypt: Why is Israel so Blind?

Egypt: Why is Israel so Blind?

The last several decades have shown that left-leaning politicos have been right about the nuances of the peace process.

Last Modified: 09 Feb 2011 11:02 GMT

Email Article

Email Article

Print Article

Print Article

Share article

Share Article

Send Feedback

Send Feedback

http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/Images/2011/2/8/20112813284333738_20.jpg

Israel's President Shimon Peres (R) has consistently tried to show the international community that Israel is committed to peace with the Palestinians [Reuters]

Those of us in the pro-Israel, pro-peace camp do not enjoy being proven right — although we invariably are.

Our standard recommendation to Israel is that it should move quickly to achieve agreements with the Arab states and the stateless Palestinians before it is too late.

And the Israeli response is that there is no urgency to make peace — except on Israeli terms — because Israel is strong and the Arabs are weak.

The most egregious example of this phenomenon comes from Egypt, where in 1971 President Anwar Sadat offered to begin negotiations toward peace in exchange for a two-mile wide Israeli withdrawal from the east bank of the Suez Canal, which Israel had captured along with the rest of the Sinai Peninsula in the 1967 war.

Learning from history

The Nixon administration told the Israeli government to explore the idea because Sadat was intent on going to war if he did not get his territory back.

The peace camp in Israel and its allies here urged Israel to follow Nixon's advice and hear Sadat out. The lobby, of course, told Nixon to mind his own business.

As for the Israeli cabinet, it told Nixon's emissary, Assistant Secretary of State Joseph Sisco, that it had no interest in discussing Egypt's offer. It voted for keeping all of the Sinai Peninsula and sending Egypt a simple message: no. After all, the Egyptians had shown just four years earlier that they were no match for the IDF.

Two years later, the Egyptians attacked, and within hours all of Israel's positions along the canal were overrun and its soldiers killed. By the time the war ended, Israel had lost 3,000 soldiers and almost the state itself. And then, a few years later, it gave up the entire Sinai anyway - not just the two-mile strip Egypt had demanded in 1971.

The peace camp was proven right. But I don't recall anyone being happy about it. On the contrary, we were devastated. 3,000 Israelis (and thousands more Egyptians) were killed in a war that might have been prevented if the Israeli government had simply agreed to talk.

Reneging on Oslo

This pattern has been repeated over and over again. The Oslo Israeli-Palestinian peace process, which gave Israel its safest and most optimistic years in its history, collapsed after Prime Ministers Binyamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak repeatedly refused to live up to its terms.

During the Oslo process, Yasir Arafat's Palestinian Authority did what it was supposed to do: it combated terrorism so effectively (Hamas had launched a series of deadly bus bombings to thwart the peace process) that Netanyahu himself telephoned Arafat to thank him. By 1999, terrorism was effectively defeated in Israel. It was an amazing time, with the free and safe movement of goods and people from Israel to the West Bank and back again - not the way it is today with a towering wall separating Israelis from Palestinians and dividing Palestinians on one side from Palestinians on the other.

But the temporary end of terrorism did not achieve the transfer of any actual territory to the Palestinians. Netanyahu and Barak nickeled and dimed the Palestinians to death - actually, to the death of the peace process, which for all intents and purposes is now buried. By the time Clinton convened the Camp David summit in 2000, any good will between the two sides was gone.

One could go on and on. According to President Bill Clinton, Prime Minister Ehud Barak could have had peace with Syria in 2000 until, at the very last minute, Barak chickened out. He was afraid of the settlers. The opportunity for full peace with Syria, which would almost certainly also mean peace with Lebanon, as well as a lowering of tensions with Syria's ally, Iran, came again in December 2008.

Missed opportunity

The Turks had brokered a deal with the Syrians that Prime Minister Olmert celebrated with a five-hour Ankara dinner with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Olmert went home. The Turks waited for Israel's final approval.

And then this is what happened next, according to Israeli New York University professor Alon Ben-Meir:

To the utter surprise and dismay of the Turkish government, five days after Olmert returned to Jerusalem, Israel began a massive incursion into Gaza. Ankara felt betrayed by the Israeli action and deceived by Olmert's failure to inform the Turkish Prime Minister of Israel's pending operation of which he, as the Prime Minister, was obviously fully aware of and could have disclosed to his Turkish counterpart while he was still in Ankara. For Mr. Erdogan, the problem was compounded not only because he did not hear from Olmert the message of peace which he eagerly anticipated, but a 'declaration' of war with all of its potential regional consequences.

It is hard to describe the depth of the Turks' disappointment, not only because they were left in the dark, but because a major breakthrough in the Arab-Israeli peace process of historical magnitude was snatched away.

This incident was a major first step toward the collapse of Israeli-Turkish friendship, which - along with the relationship with Mubarak's Egypt - was the cornerstone of Israel's sense of security.

Who's left? Jordan. However, Israel consistently ignores King Abdullah's demands that it end the occupation of the West Bank and the blockade of Gaza.

And then there is the US. President Obama put his prestige on the line to achieve an end to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict but all Israel did in response was to ridicule him and reject every suggestion the president made - no matter that Israel receives more US aid than any other country, by far.

Anyone who cares about Israel at all has to be appalled by these repeated blunders - all backed by AIPAC and its cutouts in Congress.

Future steps

When will Israel's supposed friends learn?

Maybe never. In today's New York Times, Yossi Klein Halevi, an influential Israeli journalist, expresses fear, almost terror, about the Egyptian revolution. He tells a "grim assumption":

It is just a matter of time before the only real opposition group in Egypt, the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood, takes power. Israelis fear that Egypt will go the way of Iran or Turkey, with Islamists gaining control through violence or gradual co-optation.

Note how Halevi conflates Turkey with Iran (a ridiculous comparison based only on the fact that democratic Turkey opposes Israel's blockade of Gaza) and then adds Egypt to the list.

And then there is the latest fright word, the Muslim Brotherhood. You would never know it from Halevi, but the Brotherhood is non-violent, has always opposed al-Qaeda, and condemned 9/11 and other acts of international terrorism.

Yes, they are an Islamic organization which would prefer an Egypt based on Islamic law, much as the Shas party - a significant part of Israel's ruling coalition - pushes for an Israel based on its extreme interpretation of Torah.

Halevi (and other lobby types) may want the Muslim Brotherhood to be terrorists but, sadly for them, that is not true. And, besides, the January 25 revolution is not a Muslim Brotherhood revolution. They support it - almost all Egyptians do - but that does not make it theirs. Nor do they claim otherwise.

The bottom line: I am happy for the Egyptian people, but I am sad for Israel - not because it is genuinely threatened by this revolution but because Israel's leaders seem determined to turn the revolution against them.

One can only hope that Israel and its lobby wake up. I hate always being proven right when it comes to Israel. I care about it too much.

MJ Rosenberg is a Senior Foreign Policy Fellow at Media Matters Action Network. The above article first appeared in Foreign Policy Matters, a part of the Media Matters Action Network.

The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.

Source:

Al Jazeera

 

Flanders: "White schools are becoming whiter, black schools are becoming blacker"

Flanders: "White schools are becoming whiter, black schools are becoming blacker"

Via VRT:

According to Mieke Van Hecke, the head of the Catholic schools in Flanders, efforts to do away with so-called concentration schools have been fruitless.

In Flanders, the word "concentratiescholen" is used for schools where too many pupils of a certain race, descent or social class are sitting together, in other words, schools that have no "healthy" mix between local pupils and immigrants.


In order to tackle the problem of these so-called concentration schools, the education department had worked out several measures. However, these do not seem to work. "White schools are becoming whiter, black schools are becoming blacker", Ms Van Hecke points out. She stresses that the schools are not to be blamed. "You have a lot of factors playing a role, like the place of residence, mobility and information about school enrolment options and rules."

Ms Van Hecke openly asks whether these measures should be continued. "Do we still want to look for ways to create a healthy mix between local pupils and pupils of foreign descent? Or do we choose to give vulnerable schools more cash, to allow them to adopt a different approach towards strong and weaker pupils?"

(source)

 

Tunisia senate agrees to widen presidential powers

Tunisia senate agrees to widen presidential powers

Tunisian interim President Fouad MebazaaPresident Fouad Mebazaa is the former speaker of the lower house of parliament

Continue reading the main story

Tunisia turmoil

Tunisia's senate has passed legislation that gives interim President Fouad Mebazaa the power to rule by decree.

The move comes three weeks after protesters ousted President Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali from power into exile in Saudi Arabia.

Mr Mebazaa will now be able to sidestep parliament which is dominated by associates of Mr Ben Ali.

The interim government has been struggling to restore order following the departure of Mr Ben Ali.

The lower house passed the bill on Monday.

Interim Prime Minister Mohammed Ghannouchi said the legislation was needed to speed up reforms as people were anxious for change.

"Time is precious," he said on Monday.

He told the senate that political parties banned under Mr Ben Ali would be made legal within days, AFP news agency reports.

Over the weekend it was announced that the former ruling party would be suspended and its offices closed.

Mr Ghannouchi, a longtime ally of Mr Ben Ali who served as his prime minister for 11 years, has promised to hold elections within six months.

The toppling of Mr Ben Ali after 23 years in power helped inspire the current anti-government protests in Egypt.

The UN says that at least 219 people died during Tunisia's protests which began in December.

BBC

Tunisia senate agrees to widen presidential powers

Tunisia senate agrees to widen presidential powers

Tunisian interim President Fouad MebazaaPresident Fouad Mebazaa is the former speaker of the lower house of parliament

Continue reading the main story

Tunisia turmoil

Tunisia's senate has passed legislation that gives interim President Fouad Mebazaa the power to rule by decree.

The move comes three weeks after protesters ousted President Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali from power into exile in Saudi Arabia.

Mr Mebazaa will now be able to sidestep parliament which is dominated by associates of Mr Ben Ali.

The interim government has been struggling to restore order following the departure of Mr Ben Ali.

The lower house passed the bill on Monday.

Interim Prime Minister Mohammed Ghannouchi said the legislation was needed to speed up reforms as people were anxious for change.

"Time is precious," he said on Monday.

He told the senate that political parties banned under Mr Ben Ali would be made legal within days, AFP news agency reports.

Over the weekend it was announced that the former ruling party would be suspended and its offices closed.

Mr Ghannouchi, a longtime ally of Mr Ben Ali who served as his prime minister for 11 years, has promised to hold elections within six months.

The toppling of Mr Ben Ali after 23 years in power helped inspire the current anti-government protests in Egypt.

The UN says that at least 219 people died during Tunisia's protests which began in December.

BBC

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Arab media view Egypt 'earthquake'

Arab media view Egypt 'earthquake'

A portrait of President Mubarak is left behind by demonstrators

Time for change in Egypt?

Egypt Unrest

As events in Egypt continue to dominate media coverage across the Middle East and beyond, Arab commentators ponder the impact of Egyptian developments on the wider region.

Whatever their view of what might happen next, most agree that events on the streets of Cairo and other Egyptian cities constitute an "earthquake" for the Arab world. Many see "winds of change" at work and speak of a "revolution" taking place.

Abd-al-Aziz Gurmul in Algeria's El-Khabar

The maps are changing and the people's power is breaking the steel ring of fear. An entire generation is moving towards another future. From Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, Yemen and tomorrow Libya, Morocco and Algeria, the earth is shaking for the Arab police states due to the people's protests, civil disobedience and strikes calling for the removal of governments.

Editorial by Yusuf al-Kublit in Saudi Al-Riyadh

[Egypt's] earthquake is laying the foundations of a new map!... We are facing a variable that changes in consecutive tremors. This time the West cannot place the Soviet east at the forefront and neither can Arab journalists and politicians claim that these are conspiracies plotted by the West. This is because what is taking place is tension that has exploded at a moment that has not been planned, which is an issue that will have major consequences for all.

Shafiq Nazim al-Ghabra in pan-Arab Al-Hayat

The winds of change in Egypt will blow all over the Arab world, carrying with them a new Arab generation which is searching for a secure and free life and participation in the building of democratic civil states. The generation of "Facebook", the internet, globalization, freedoms and participation is knocking at the doors of all Arab countries.

Abd-al-Bari Atwan in pan-Arab Al-Quds Al-Arabi

The situation in Egypt is very confusing, but one thing that is very clear is that President Husni Mubarak has refused to respond to the demands of the overwhelming majority of the Egyptian people to leave his post... If only the Egyptian president, his army and allies would immediately emulate the Tunisian example as there is no shame in this.

Editorial in Saudi Arabi's Arab News

The demand for change in parts of the Arab world is deafening and has to be heard. But stability, security and effective government are also fundamental rights which the public demand. We have seen in Egypt and Tunisia where people's immediate concerns lay when the looting started. In Iraq and Somalia the absence of stability and security has had far more devastating consequences. It must not be allowed to happen elsewhere. Change must be managed in a way that guarantees stability.

Muhiyadin al-Muhammad in Syria's Al-Thawrah

What happened, and is still happening, in Egypt is the natural outcome of a policy of ignoring the people and allowing others to violate the sovereignty, national interests and national security of Egypt and the [entire Arab] nation.

Samir al-Hajawi in Jordan's Al-Ra'y

In spite of all these rapid developments what is happening in Tahrir Square remains the determining factor and the decision of the youth in Tahrir Square will remain the decisive one in the coming hours. It is a decision that is open to all possibilities.

Jalal Amin in Lebanon's Al-Safir

The explosion by the Egyptian people that began on Tuesday 25 January and is still going on for the ninth consecutive day is not an uprising caused by hunger, as many think, but an uprising of angry people. The anger is very clear on the faces of the protesters.

Ahmad Abd-al-Malik in the UAE's Al-Ittihad

Have the Egyptian people conveyed their message to other Arab governments and people, similar to what happened in Tunisia? And will the message be received positively? As events in Egypt continue to dominate media coverage across the Middle East and beyond, Arab commentators ponder the impact of Egyptian developments on the wider region.

BBC Monitoring selects and translates news from radio, television, press, news agencies and the internet from 150 countries in more than 70 languages. It is based in Caversham, UK, and has several bureaux abroad.

SOURCE: BBC

 

Friday, February 4, 2011

Russia: Alcohol-serving bars targeted in Muslim regions

Russia: Alcohol-serving bars targeted in Muslim regions

Via Reuters (h/t EuropeNews):

A masked guard clad in camouflage pokes his AK-47 rifle into the shoulder of a vodka-guzzling client in a hotel bar in Russia's Muslim Ingushetia region, and orders him to leave immediately.

The state-employed security guard then leads the man and his coterie of quiet revellers out of the dimly lit bar.

"We heard reports rebels are on the prowl again and we want to prevent any damage," said the guard, who wished to remain anonymous.

At least a dozen places selling alcohol in the North Caucasus were attacked with grenades, bombs and gunfire over the last year as armed Islamists bent on installing sharia law have stepped up their battle against those who fancy a tipple.

Last week saw the latest fatal attack in the town of Khasavyurt in Dagestan, near the border with Chechnya, where a bomb ripped through an alcohol-serving cafe, killing four.

State-run media showed pictures of the wrecked cafe, with only its torched sign, "Karavan," meaning "Caravan," remaining.

Islamist rebels later said in a statement that "the owners were repeatedly warned but they were arrogant."

"It is only a matter of time before places involved in the filth of alcohol... will meet their destruction," they said on the insurgency-affiliated website jamaatshariat.com .

(source)

 

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Five charged for inciting anti-gay hatred outside mosque

UK: Five charged for inciting anti-gay hatred outside mosque

Via the Daily Telegraph:

Ihjaz Ali, 41, Umar Javed, 37, and Mehboob Hussain, 44, are accused of distributing threatening written material intending to stir up hatred on the grounds of sexual orientation after they were said to have handed out leaflets calling for the death penalty for homosexuals.

Two of their alleged accomplices, Razwan Javed, 30, and Kabir Ahmed, 27, were charged with the same offence on Thursday.


All five will appear in court next month for a committal hearing after a district judge ruled the case would have to be heard by the Crown Court.

All three men plead not guilty to leafleting in Shaftesbury Crescent and Princes St, whilst Ali plead not guilty to a further charge of distributing leaflets outside the mosque.

(source)