Showing posts with label WORLD AFFAIRS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WORLD AFFAIRS. Show all posts

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Mursi links freedom with ‘responsibility’ in his debut United Nations speech

Mursi links freedom with 'responsibility' in his debut United Nations speech



AP

Thursday 27 September 2012

UNITED NATIONS: Egypt's new President Muhammed Mursi debuts at the United Nations yesterday with a speech that will be closely watched by world leaders for clues about his democratic intentions and plans for lifting his country out of crippling poverty.
Mursi, an Islamist and key figure in the once-banned Muslim Brotherhood, is the first democratically-elected leader of the ancient land at the heart of the Arab world. He was sworn in June 30.

Another Arab leader making his first appearances at the UN General Assembly's annual ministerial meeting after being swept into power by the Arab Spring revolutions was Yemen's President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi, who took office in February after more than a year of political turmoil and is now trying to steer his country's democratic transition. Hadi called on the UN to grant membership to Palestine and support a transfer of power in Syria.

"The only option for our brothers in Syria is to agree on an initiative ... for peaceful change and transfer of power through ballot boxes," he said.
Mursi previewed his General Assembly remarks in a speech delivered Tuesday at former President Bill Clinton's Global Initiative. Addressing the violence that raged across the Muslim world in response to a video produced in the US that denigrated Islam's Prophet Muhammad, the Egyptian leader said freedom of expression must come with "responsibility." He appeared to have been responding to President Barack Obama's General Assembly speech earlier Tuesday in which the US leader again condemned the video but sternly defended the US Constitution's guarantees of free speech.

At least 51 people were killed in violence that erupted last week in Muslim countries, including the US ambassador to Libya and three other Americans targeted in an attack on the US consulate in Benghazi.
Mursi said the video and the violent reaction to it demanded "reflection." He said freedom of expression must be linked with responsibility, "especially when it comes with serious implications for international peace and stability."
With no sign of an end to the Security Council's paralysis over intervening to end the raging Syrian civil war, Germany's UN Ambassador Peter Wittig said his country chose to focus the council's ministerial session on something new and positive in the Mideast — "the emergence of the Arab League as a regional actor that has proved to be essential for conflict resolution."

Friday, September 21, 2012

Protests erupt in Pakistan over anti-Islam film

Latest in Protests Over Anti-Islam Film

Latest in Protests Over Anti-Islam Film



By The Associated Press
September 21, 2012 (AP)

Here's a look at protests and events across the world on Friday connected to an amateurish anti-Muslim film produced in the United States and vulgar caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad published in a French satirical weekly. At least 47 people, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya, have been killed in violence linked to the protests over the film, which has also renewed debate over freedom of expression in the U.S. and in Europe.

———

PAKISTAN

Seventeen people were killed and dozens were injured as tens of thousands protested against the film around the country after the government encouraged peaceful protests and declared a national holiday — "Love for the Prophet Day." Demonstrations turned violent in several Pakistani cities. Among those killed was a driver for a Pakistani television station, who died after police opened fire on rioters torching a cinema in the northwest city of Peshawar during a protest.

Clashes between police and thousands of stone-throwing protesters also occurred in Lahore, Karachi and Islamabad, the Pakistani capital.

———

AFGHANISTAN

About 900 people have gathered for a protest against the film in the capital, Kabul, chanting "death to America" and burning an effigy of President Barack Obama and an American flag. A few hundred demonstrators also protested inside a mosque in the eastern city of Ghazni. The protests were peaceful.

AP
A Pakistani protestor hurls back a tear gas... View Full Caption

———

IRAN

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad lashed out at the West over the film. Speaking during a military parade in Tehran, he said: "in return for (allowing) the ugliest insults to the divine messenger, they — the West — raise the slogan of respect for freedom of speech." He said this explanation was "clearly a deception."

———

INDONESIA

The United States closed its diplomatic missions across Indonesia due to continuing demonstrations over the anti-Islam film. Small and mostly orderly protests were held outside the U.S. Embassy in Jakarta and in the cities of Surabaya and Medan, along with a couple other smaller towns. No violence was reported.

In addition to the embassy in Jakarta and consulate offices in Surabaya, Medan and Bali, the American mission to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations also was shut.

———

IRAQ

About 3,000 people, mostly followers of Iranian-backed Shiite Muslim groups, protested against the film and caricatures in the southern city of Basra. Demonstrators carried Iraqi flags and posters of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, chanting "death to America" and "no to America."

They burnt Israeli and American flags. One of the organizers, Qassim al-Moussawi, told AP that people gathered "to express our anger and resentment on the offenses made against our prophet."

———

SRI LANKA

About 2,000 Muslims burned effigies of President Barack Obama and American flags at a protest after Friday prayers in the capital, Colombo, demanding that the United States ban the film.

———

BANGLADESH

Over 2,000 people marched through the streets of the capital, Dhaka, to protest the film. They burned a makeshift coffin draped in an American flag, and an effigy of Obama.



———

LEBANON

Thousands gathered in the Bekaa Valley for the latest in a series of protest rallies organized by the Shiite militant group Hezbollah. Protesters carried the yellow Hezbollah flag.

———

KASHMIR

Police enforced a daylong curfew in parts of Indian-controlled Kashmir's main city, Srinagar, and chased away protesters opposing the anti-Islam film. Authorities in the region also temporarily blocked mobile phone and Internet services to prevent viewing the film clips.

———

GERMANY

Several hundred people gathered in the city of Freiburg in southwest of Germany to protest the film. Some carried banners saying: "The dignity of the Prophet Muhammad is our dignity." Police banned inflammatory slogans.

The Interior Ministry postponed a poster campaign aimed at countering radical Islam among young people due to tensions caused by the online video insulting Islam. Posters for the campaign — in German, Turkish and Arabic — were meant to go on display in German cities with large immigrant populations on Friday, but are being withheld because of the changed security situation. Germany is home to an estimated 4 million Muslims.

———

NORWAY

Crowds gathered outside the U.S. Embassy in the capital Oslo to protest the prophet film shouting "Obama, Obama, we're all Osama."

Some 70 people took part in the hour-long demonstration on Friday afternoon. Police blocked off the street during the peaceful protest.

———

PHILIPPINES

A law professor defied a ban by Philippine university officials and has shown students the film's 14-minute trailer. Constitutional law professor Harry Roque of the University of the Philippines said the film was "trash and nothing but trash" and will not convince people Islam is evil.

http://MuslimWindow.blogspot.com/

Sunday, September 16, 2012

JOINT UN-ARAB LEAGUE ENVOY AND SYRIAN PRESIDENT DISCUSS WORSENING CRISIS

JOINT UN-ARAB LEAGUE ENVOY AND SYRIAN PRESIDENT DISCUSS WORSENING CRISIS

The Joint Special Representative of the United Nations and the League of Arab States on the Syrian crisis, Lakhdar Brahimi, discussed the ongoing violence and worsening humanitarian situation with President Bashar al-Assad during a meeting in Damascus on Saturday.

Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Mr. Brahimi said the crisis is getting worse and has serious consequences on the Syrian people, the region and the entire world.

"We discussed this issue. I believe that the President is more aware than me of the scope and seriousness of this crisis," said the envoy, who arrived earlier this week for meetings with representatives of the Government, the opposition and civil society.

"I informed the President that we, in the name of the United Nations and the League of Arab States, will exert every effort, present ideas and mobilize capacities and potentials required for this situ
ation in order to best help the Syrian people out of this crisis."

More than 18,000 people, mostly civilians, have died since the uprising against President Bashar al-Assad began 18 months ago. Amidst reports of an escalation in violence in recent weeks in many towns and villages, as well as the country's two biggest cities, Damascus and Aleppo, UN agencies now estimate that some 2.5 million Syrians are in urgent need of humanitarian assistance.

"This crisis is becoming worse by the day," stated Mr. Brahimi, adding that it is urgent to address it in a proper manner.

Following his visit to Syria, Mr. Brahimi will go to New York to meet with Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and the Security Council, "as well as a number of States which have influence, interests, or both, with regard to the Syrian issue," he said.

Mr. Brahimi earlier this month assumed the peace-facilitation role which had been carried out since February by a former UN Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, with the aim of brin
ging an end to all violence and human rights violations in Syria, and promoting a peaceful solution to the conflict.

Four Nato troops killed by 'Afghan police'-bbc

Four Nato troops killed by 'Afghan police'-bbc

Taliban Conflict
Marching forwards
Taliban fighters switch sides
What lies ahead?
Nato's exit strategyWatch

Four soldiers with the Nato-led force in Afghanistan have been killed in an attack thought to have been carried out by Afghan police members, Nato says.

The "insider attack" took place in the south of the country and one of the attackers was reportedly killed.

The latest incident comes a day after two UK soldiers were killed at a checkpoint by a man in police uniform.

On Friday, two US marines were killed in a Taliban attack on Nato's Camp Bastion base in southern Afghanistan.

Militants breached the perimeter of the sprawling Camp Bastion base in Helmand province, destroying six aircraft.

The Taliban told the BBC that they carried out Friday's attack in revenge for a film mocking Islam which has triggered protests around the Muslim world.

More than 50 soldiers with the Nato-led force have been killed so far this year in so-called insider - or green-on-blue - attacks.


http://MuslimWindow.blogspot.com/

Al Qaida calls for more attacks


Al Qaida calls for more attacks
Al Qaida's most active branch in the Middle East has called for more attacks on US embassies to "set the fires blazing", seeking to use the outrage over an anti-Muslim film which sparked a wave of protests that swept 20 countries.
Senior Muslim religious authorities issued their strongest pleas yet against resorting to violence, trying to defuse Muslim anger over the film, a day after new attacks on US and Western embassies that left at least eight protesters dead.
The top cleric in US ally Saudi Arabia, Grand Mufti Sheik Abdel-Aziz al-Sheik, condemned the film but, urging Muslims not to be "dragged by anger" into violence, said it could not really hurt Islam.
Sheik Ahmed al-Tayeb, head of the Sunni Muslim world's pre-eminent religious institution, Egypt's Al-Azhar, backed peaceful protests but said Muslims should counter the film by reviving Islam's moderate ideas.
In the Egyptian capital Cairo, where the first protests against the film that denigrates the Prophet Muhammad erupted, police finally succeeded in clearing away protesters who had clashed with security forces for days near the US embassy. Police arrested 220 people and a concrete wall was erected across the road leading to the embassy.
No significant protests were reported in the Middle East on Saturday; the only report of violence linked to the film came from Australia, where riot police clashed with about 200 protesters at the US consulate in Sydney.
In his weekly radio and internet address, US president Barack Obama paid tribute to the four Americans, including ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens, who were killed in an armed attack on the US consulate in Benghazi this week. "I have made it clear that the United States has a profound respect for people of all faiths. We stand for religious freedom. And we reject the denigration of religion - including Islam," Mr Obama said. "Yet there is never any justification for violence. There is no religion that condones the targeting of innocent men and women."
But the Yemen-based al Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, considered the most dangerous of the terror network's branches to the US, called the killing of Mr Stevens "the best example" for those attacking embassies to follow. "What has happened is a great event, and these efforts should come together in one goal, which is to expel the embassies of America from the lands of the Muslims," the group said.
It called on protests to continue in Muslim nations "to set the fires blazing at these embassies". It also called on "our Muslim brothers in Western nations to fulfil their duties in supporting God's prophet ... because they are the most capable of reaching them and vexing them".
So far there has been no evidence of a direct role by al Qaida in the protests.


http://MuslimWindow.blogspot.com/

Saturday, September 15, 2012

Afghanistan:Two Marines Die In Prince Harry Base Attack

Two Marines Die In Prince Harry Base Attack
The base's perimeter is breached as militants armed with rockets damage buildings, an aircraft hangar and several military jets.




Video: Insurgents Launch Attack On Camp BastionEnlarge




Email


Militants armed with rockets have attacked a major Allied military base in Afghanistan where Prince Harry is stationed, leaving two US Marines dead and a number of others hurt.

The perimeter of Camp Bastion was breached as it was hit by small arms fire and there was major damage to buildings, an aircraft hangar and several military jets.

A US official confirmed two marines had died and several troops were injured.

This facility is often subject to indirect fire, but officials in Afghanistan say the damage that resulted was far more severe than normal. The attack was launched in the US area of the base.

A spokesman at ISAF's Joint Command said the assault was over but details including the number of attackers and whether they managed to penetrate the base were not immediately clear.

Officials in Afghanistan said it was too early to know if the attack was motivated by the anti-Muslim YouTube film which has sparked violent protests in the Middle East, Africa and Asia.

No one has yet claimed responsibility for the attack.Prince Harry arrived in Afghanistan last Friday

Prince Harry is currently stationed at Camp Bastion on his second tour of duty in Afghanistan - expected to last four months.

A Nato spokesman said the prince, who is third in line to the throne, was on the base at the time of the attack but was "never in any danger".

The Army captain, known in the military as Captain Wales, has been undergoing training to fly operations in Apache attack helicopters and is expected to start flying missions this week as co-pilot gunner.

The Taliban had described the prince as "a high value target", saying they would "make their best efforts to arrest or kill" him.

Camp Bastion is a huge, heavily fortified base in the middle of the desert shared with British, US, Danish, Estonian and Afghan troops.

It is the logistics hub for operations in Helmand province, with supply convoys and armoured patrols regularly leaving its heavily-defended gates to support military forward operating bases and checkpoints.

http://news.sky.com/story/985315/two-marines-die-in-prince-harry-base-attack

http://MuslimWindow.blogspot.com/

Monday, September 3, 2012

Pakistan: three killed and two Americans wounded in Peshawar suicide attack

Pakistan: three killed and two Americans wounded in Peshawar suicide attack

Two Americans working for the US consulate in Pakistan's north-western city of Peshawar were wounded in a bomb attack on Monday, which killed at least three other people and left a six-foot crater in a road close to United Nations offices.

You need to have the Adobe Flash Player to view this content.
Please click here to continue.

Rob Crilly in Islamabad and Ashfaq Yusufzai in Peshawar

3:20PM BST 03 Sep 2012

A SUICIDE car bomber attacked an American consulate vehicle in Pakistan on Monday, killing three people in one of the deadliest recent attacks on US interests in the country.

US officials said two Americans and two Pakistani workers were injured but contradicted a regional Pakistani minister who had earlier claimed that two Americans died.

No-one has yet claimed responsibility for the attack in the north-western city of Peshawar which injured 19 people in all and left a six-foot crater in the road.

Witnesses said a car packed with explosives rammed into a 4x4 vehicle as it emerged from the American consulate, close to United Nations offices.

TV footage showed a 4x4 at the site which had been reduced to a carcase of twisted, charred metal. Americans have frequently been targeted in the city which stands close to the Afghan border and on the edge of Pakistan's lawless tribal areas.

British Ex-PM Blair Rejects Tutu's Charge On Iraq War


British Ex-PM Blair Rejects Tutu's Charge On Iraq War

In this photo released by the United Nations Foundation, Archbishop Desmond Tutu speaks at the Social Good Summit,

VOA News

Britain's former Prime Minister Tony Blair has rejected a call by South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu that he and former U.S. President George W. Bush should go on trial for starting the war in Iraq.

The outspoken bishop wrote in the British newspaper The Observer that the two leaders acted on a false premise in 2003 when they said that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. He said that their decision to launch a war "has destabilized and polarized the world to a greater extent than any other conflict in history" and should not go unpunished.

He also said that Mr. Blair and Mr. Bush "have driven us to the edge of a precipice where we now stand - with the specter of Syria and Iran before us."

Mr. Blair issued a stern response Sunday, saying that the argument is not new and has been proven wrong. He also criticized Archbishop Tutu for saying that it was wrong to remove then Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein despite his massacre of thousands of Iraqi citizens.
Former British leader added that he had great respect for the archbishop's work.

Tutu, a Nobel Peace prize laureate and retired Anglican bishop, argued that Western leaders are held to a different standard than their African counterparts. He said the death toll during and after the Iraq conflict is sufficient for Mr. Blair and Mr. Bush to face trial in an international court.

He said he had decided not to attend a recent South African leadership conference because he would be uncomfortable to appear at a 'leadership' summit together with Mr. Blair.

Tutu was a leading activist campaigning to end apartheid in South Africa, and later chaired a panel that oversaw reconciliation efforts after the end of white minority rule.

Saturday, August 25, 2012

Kosovo Debate

Kosovo Debate

On Tuesday morning (21 August), the Council held its quarterly debate on the UN Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK). The Special Representative and head of UNMIK, Farid Zarif, is set to brief Council members during the open session and present the Secretary-General’s most recent report (S/2012/603). Serbian Prime Minister Ivica Dačić is expected to speak, accompanied by Foreign Minister Ivan Mrkić. (In the past, President-elect of the General Assembly and former Serbian Foreign Minister Vuk Jeremić has represented Serbia during these debates.) Kosovo will be represented by Prime Minister Hashim Thaçi. It is unlikely that Council members will push for any outcome in the wake of the debate.

Council members seem particularly interested in hearing from Prime Minister Dačić, who assumed his position on 27 July. (The EU-led dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina has essentially been on hold in recent months while a new Serbian government was formed.) Council members will be keen to hear the new government’s statements on the problematic implementation of agreements between Serbia and Kosovo, such as the one allowing for the participation of both Belgrade and Pristina in regional meetings.

The Secretary-General’s report of 3 August addresses a number of recurring issues which Council members are likely to consider, some of which were raised in consultations on 17 July. Several Council members have noted that the latest UNMIK report seems to be more critical of the Kosovar authorities than in the past and will be keen to hear Zarif’s analysis of recent developments. For example, in reporting on an incident on the Serbian St. Vitus Day holiday on 28 June, the report indicated that Kosovo police officers may have responded with disproportionate force and that there may have been “deficient operational planning” in a separate incident on the same day. In addition, the report calls into question the Kosovo police’s “institutional capacity” to manage tensions.

Another issue likely to be a focus of Council attention is the role of Pristina’s institutions in northern Kosovo, which is predominantly inhabited by Kosovo Serbs. Since 6 July, an administrative office run by the Kosovo authorities has been operating in north Mitrovica, although many Kosovo Serbs see it as illegitimate. The report observes that outreach by the Pristina institutions towards the population in the north is essential but also expresses concern about UNMIK funds earmarked for northern Kosovo being used to support the office run by Pristina. This matter plays into the wider issue of the end of Kosovo’s “supervised independence” and the Kosovo authorities’ position that Kosovo ought to be treated as other sovereign states.

Traditional divisions in the Council among permanent members are likely to emerge during the debate on Tuesday. Among the elected members, there is again likely to be concern from some about the reported attacks on minorities, particularly against Serbs in Kosovo, and the issue of the apparent reduction in returnee numbers. Others, including those who are involved in the NATO-led Kosovo Force and involved in EULEX, are likely to refute some of the accusations concerning attacks against Serb interests in Kosovo and emphasise the positive and responsible role that EULEX is playing on the ground.

On the recurring issue of organ trafficking, some members might allude to insufficient information on the EULEX Special Investigative Task Force’s investigations (the annex to the latest UNMIK report contains one page on this issue). If the matter is raised, there are likely to be familiar arguments presented on both sides. On one hand, there is seemingly a minority on the Council who believe the matter should come under UN auspices and, on the other, members who consider that these serious allegations are already being appropriately and impartially dealt with and that the ongoing investigation should be allowed to run its course.



http://MuslimWindow.blogspot.com/

Friday, August 24, 2012

Obama Rabbis Must Disavow Anti-Zionist

Obama Rabbis Must Disavow Anti-Zionist
Jonathan S. Tobin | 
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/08/23/rabbis-for-obama-must-disavow-anti-zionist-lynn-gottlieb/ 

Given that the majority of American Jews are loyal Democrats, it is neither surprising nor unusual that the Obama campaign would be able to assemble a large list of rabbis who endorsed the president’s re-election. But the Obama campaign, which has been falling over itself in the last several months to try and prove the dubious assertion that the incumbent is Israel’s best friend ever to sit in the White House, now finds itself in an embarrassing position as it turns out that a prominent member of the “Rabbis for Obama” who are being heralded by Democrats as truly representing Jewish opinion is an advocate for a well-known anti-Israel group.

Rabbi Lynn Gottlieb is a member of the advisory board and rabbinical council of Jewish Voices for Peace, a nice-sounding title for a far-left radical group that opposes Israeli self-defense, supports the boycott of Israel (and by this, they mean all of Israel, not just the settlements) and promotes an idea of peace in which Arab refugees may swamp Israel consistent with its indifference to the survival of it as a Jewish state. Obama’s partisan opponents at the Republican Jewish Coalition are making a meal of Gottlieb’s inclusion in the Obama list. But that leaves the rest of the rabbis for Obama with a tough question. Do they really want to include among their number someone who is opposed to Zionism and outside even the parameters of what the left-wing lobby J Street would consider “pro-Israel?”



Gottlieb, who can be viewed endorsing the boycott of Israel here, previously earned the opprobrium of the Jewish community by speaking at a 2007 dinner in New York for Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The Anti-Defamation League lists Jewish Voices for Peace as one of the “top ten anti-Israel groups” in the nation.

Of course, Rabbis for Obama is free to offer membership to anyone it wants. But if it is going to be used by the president and his party as a prop in their effort to persuade wavering Jewish voters that they can rely on Obama to stick by Israel, then its roster ought to consist of rabbis who actually do support the Jewish state. If a notorious anti-Zionist like Gottlieb is a member in good standing of Rabbis for Obama, it raises the question of what exactly the group stands for? How can it put itself forward as proof of the American Jewish community’s trust in President Obama as a faithful friend of the Jewish state when it is willing to embrace a leader of the movement to vilify Israel?

The point here is that even those who call for inclusion of left-wing groups that often protest Israeli policies like J Street in community councils, understand that Jewish Voices for Peace is beyond the pale. Any group that includes it or its leaders can’t be considered pro-Israel. Is that the message Democrats want to be putting out about its rabbinical front group?http://MuslimWindow.blogspot.com/

Assad's Aleppo backers abandon him, some shift support, cash to rebels in risky gamble

Assad's Aleppo backers abandon him, some shift support, cash to rebels in risky gamble

More ByTucker Reals, Khaled Wassef-cbsnews


A Syrian rebel sits in a van in Aleppo, Aug. 19, 2012. (Credit: Getty)

(CBS News) LONDON - Eighteen months after anti-Assad street protests spiraled into all-out civil war, sources inside Aleppo tell CBS News that many of the business leaders, scholars and other prominent figures in Syria's largest city, who have backed President Bashar Assad and his family for decades, no longer see a future under his rule.

CBS News has learned that at least 48 of Aleppo's elite, calling themselves the "Front of Aleppo Islamic Scholars" (FAIS) - which has a Facebook page established just last year - have hand-picked a provisional city council to take over Aleppo when Assad loses his grip on the country - and they are gambling on one of the many rebel groups fighting in the city to become its eventual protectors.

Syria's civil war claims 10 more lives in Lebanon
Russia says West is instigating
The other side of Syria's civil war

A document obtained by CBS News details the various duties of the provisional administration's 18 members. This city government-in-waiting includes doctors, engineers, tradesmen and university professors, each tasked according to their knowledge and experience.

"The main objective for forming such a government is to fill in the administrative vacuum in the city and unite the efforts of revolutionary forces," says the document, indicating that while Assad ostensibly may still be in charge of Syria, his government is no longer able to run Aleppo to the satisfaction of its civic leaders.

The document, provided to CBS News by a trusted opposition source, lays out the new 18-member council, listing some of its members by name, others only by initials. Many of them will have been ardent supporters of the Assad regime, and with the fight for the city so far from over, some may still be backing his rule, in their official capacities, at least.

The defenders of Aleppo


Crucially, the document from FAIS states that one of the rebel factions fighting in the city, the al-Tawheed Brigades, has been entrusted with Aleppo's security. According to the document, the brigades' task now is to unite the other factions across the city to beat Assad's forces out of Aleppo, and then keep the city secure once they're gone.

"The management of the military operations goes to the leader of al-Tawheed Brigades, as the most prominent fighting group," reads the document, which has not been disseminated publicly. "As soon as all the other fighting factions are united, the management of the military operations would then be transferred to the higher military command."

FAIS has placed a great deal of faith in the hands of the Tawheed Brigades, perhaps because the scholars see no better option, but tapping the faction to act as the defenders of Aleppo is a decision which comes with baggage, and possible ramifications down the road.

The Brigades is comprised of smaller rebel fighting groups, including a significant number of former pro-Assad militias (shabiha) which have switched sides having seen their payment from the regime dry up. The Tawheed is one of about five large rebel factions fighting in Aleppo.

It is undoubtedly the group with the biggest public profile, having produced virtually all of the online videos to emerge from the city, which often depict fighters marching defiantly through the streets after apparent victories or crouching behind walls to take aim at unseen regime forces.

The Tawheed is also the best-connected of Aleppo's rebel armies. They come from the rural districts to the north of the city - the districts through which the vast majority of the weapons, ammunition and money from abroad reach Aleppo via Turkey. The group has alleged connections to Turkish intelligence.

They are also strong in number - claiming to be the largest of the factions fighting in Aleppo. With the only available evidence - the many videos the Tawheed Brigades produce - seeming to back this claim, and with their control over the supply route from Turkey, they may have been the logical choice for FAIS.

An opposition united, for now



A commander from another of Aleppo's rebel groups, however, based in the east of the city, tells CBS News that the Tawheed Brigades' claims are exaggerated. He says the brigades make up just 15 to 20 percent of the rebels in the city, and that men from its ranks are to blame for the looting and crime which has left many local residents distrustful, even disdainful, of the rebels on the whole.

Asked about those allegations, Abu Majid, a Tawheed Brigades commander in Aleppo, tells CBS News "there have been acts of looting and pillage in Aleppo, but those were individual incidents and not a general trend, and they are not limited only to Tawheed Brigades."

"Tawheed Brigades enrolled many fighters when it moved into the city from the northern provinces; We had to do that in order to be able to cover the large areas of the city. But in doing so, we couldn't carry out the necessary checks on the background of each group of fighters."

Majid said the issue was being addressed with the formation of a security committee, "tasked with policing the various fighting groups on the ground and making sure that criminal activities are stopped."

the commander from the other rebel group also says the Brigades - which, according to its own leaders and according to the document composed by FAIS,should be acting as distributors of ammunition and weapons to the other groups as the clashes with their common enemy flare up around the city - is cooperating only on its own terms.

He tells CBS News that a fight to maintain a foothold in the Salaheddine district earlier this month was lost to Assad's forces because the Tawheed Brigades would not heed requests from the local rebel group for more ammunition. He says the local group even offered to hand over their positions in Salaheddine to the Brigade to continue the fight, but they declined.

His account is lent credence by rebel fighters who told a CBS News crew as they left the Salaheddine battle that they had to abandon the fight when ammunition ran out.

The loss was called a tactical retreat by rebel leaders, but it served the Assad regime a fresh propaganda victory to show they were reclaiming territory in the vital city.

The Tawheed brigade is composed largely of farmers and other men from the rural northern districts of Aleppo. Other factions are made up of more religiously motivated subgroups. Each has its own identity and motivations. Right now, they appear to be working more or less in unison against Assad's forces, but it's clear the various groups will not always see eye-to-eye.

Backing from FAIS will channel more funding - local funding from Aleppo's business elite who are keen to ensure their interests are protected in the post-Assad era - directly to the Tawheed Brigades. But other groups in the city are still fighting independently, still managing to rearm, and they won't necessarily be eager to embrace the Tawheed as their new commanders when the common enemy is defeated.

The battle for control of Aleppo may rage on, even after Assad falls.

http://MuslimWindow.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

We must protect true meaning of marriage, says Roman Catholic leader

We must protect true meaning of marriage, says Roman Catholic leader
The true meaning of marriage is in danger of being lost under David Cameron’s plans to extend it to same-sex couples, the leader of five million Roman Catholics in England and Wales will warn this weekend.

The Archbishop of Westminster, the Most Reverend Vincent Nichols Photo: DAVID ROSE



By John Bingham, Religious Affairs Editor

Redefining marriage to include homosexuals would be a “profoundly radical step” stripping it of its “distinctive nature”, the Archbishop of Westminster, the Most Reverend Vincent Nichols, will say.


The warning, the most significant intervention yet into the debate on gay marriage, is in a letter to be read from the pulpit in 2,500 churches during Mass this Sunday. It has been seen by The Daily Telegraph as the Government prepares to announce the terms of a national consultation on a proposed change to the law on marriage.

The last time the leadership of the Roman Catholic Church intervened on a political issue, during the threat to impose quotas on faith schools in 2007, ministers climbed down within days.

Significantly, the letter, co-signed by the Archbishop of Southwark, the Most Reverend Peter Smith, adopts a strikingly moderate tone, in contrast with that of Cardinal Keith O’Brien, the leader of the Roman Catholic Church in Scotland, who accused the Coalition of a “grotesque subversion” at the weekend.

As well as setting out Church teaching, it appeals to wider society, arguing that marriage is a “natural institution” with a meaning understood far beyond the confines of the religion. It says that extending it to same-sex couples would reduce marriage to a vague commitment between two people. The archbishops argue that marriage between a man and a woman is “at the foundation of our society”, but also praise the “remarkable example of courage and fidelity” displayed by many who have suffered marital breakdown.

RELATED ARTICLES

Catholic leader: gay marriage is like slavery 05 Mar 2012

Cardinal Keith O'Brien: We cannot indulge this madness 03 Mar 2012

Catholics will be called to oppose gay marriage 05 May 2012

While quoting the Catechism, which defines marriage as a sacrament, they say that their “instinctive understanding” of marriage as a setting both for secure relationships and bringing up children will be shared by wider society. “Neither the Church nor the State has the power to change this fundamental understanding of marriage itself,” they write. “Nor is this simply a matter of public opinion.”

Crucially, they argue against changing the meaning of civil, as well as religious, marriage. The Government had hoped to neutralise opposition from a coalition led by the former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Carey, by offering reassurances that churches would not be forced to marry gay couples.

Writing in The Daily Telegraph last week the equalities minister, Lynne Featherstone, insisted that the Government was not “trampling over tradition” but “allowing a space” for homosexual rights to be respected alongside religious belief.

The archbishops’ letter has been sent to bishops across England and Wales and is being circulated to parishes this week. It is accompanied by a cover note asking priests to encourage their parishioners to sign a petition set up by Lord Carey’s Coalition for Marriage, opposing the redefinition of marriage.

More than a million people attend Roman Catholic services each week, out of an estimated five million Catholics in England and Wales. In 2007, a letter issued by the then Archbishop of Westminster, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, helped secure the future of faith schools as the Labour government came under pressure from unions to end state funding.

Alan Johnson, the then education secretary, had attempted to impose quotas on faith schools, forcing them to reserve a quarter of places for non-churchgoing families. Faced with the lobbying campaign spearheaded by the Church, he climbed down within days.

Churchgoers will be encouraged to take part in the Government consultation when it begins and lobby their MPs directly.

“The reasons given by our Government for wanting to change the definition of marriage are those of equality and discrimination,” the archbishops write. “But our present law does not discriminate unjustly when it requires both a man and a woman for marriage. It simply recognises and protects the distinctive nature of marriage.

“Changing the legal definition of marriage would be a profoundly radical step. Its consequences should be taken seriously now.”

Changing the law would “gradually and inevitably” change society’s understanding of the purpose of marriage, they say.

“It would reduce it just to the commitment of the two people involved. There would be no recognition of the complementarity of male and female or that marriage is intended for the procreation and education of children.”

Setting out their ideas on marriage they add: “The roots of the institution of marriage lie in our nature.

“This pattern is, of course, affirmed by many other religious traditions — understood as a lifelong commitment between a man and a woman, and for the creation and upbringing of children, marriage is an expression of our fundamental humanity.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/9124963/We-must-protect-true-meaning-of-marriage-says-Roman-Catholic-leader.html

http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Israel okays new buildings in east Jerusalem

Israel okays new buildings in east Jerusalem

Construction of 1,100 housing units cleared, despite Palestinian demands for settlement freeze to renew peace talks.


Netanyahu has refused to halt settlement building despite repeated calls from Palestinians [Reuters]

Israel's government has granted the go-ahead for construction of 1,100 new housing units in illegally occupied east Jerusalem, raising already heightened tensions fuelled by last week's Palestinian move to seek full UN membership.

Israel's interior ministry said on Tuesday that the homes would be built in Gilo, a Jewish enclave in southeast Jerusalem. It said construction could begin after a mandatory 60-day period for public comment, a process that is largely a formality.

The Palestinians claim east Jerusalem as their future capital. They have demanded that Israel halt all settlement construction in east Jerusalem and the adjacent occupied West Bank - territories captured and illegally occupied by Israel since1967 - as a condition for resuming peace talks.
In Depth



Q&A: Jewish settlements
Foreign fighters support Israel's settlements
Opinion:
US vs UN on Israeli settlements
Boycott the state, not just the settlements
Israel abandoned

Israel says all of Jerusalem, home to Jewish, Muslim and Christian holy sites, is part of its capital and will not be divided.

Saeb Erekat, the chief Palestinian negotiator, swiftly condemned the Israeli decision, saying it amounted to "1,100 no's to the resumption of peace talks."

He urged the United States, Israel's closest and most important ally, to change its position and support the Palestinians in their quest for UN membership.

With peace talks stalled for the past three years, the Palestinians last week asked theUN to recognise an independent Palestinian state in the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza Strip.

The US opposes the measure and has vowed to veto the request in the Security Council. Like Israel, the US says a Palestinian state can only be established through negotiations.

In an interview published Tuesday, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said he would not freeze settlement construction again.

Speaking to the Jerusalem Post, he said that a 10-month moratorium on new construction last year failed to yield results. He said he saw no need for another freeze.

Netanyahu says negotiations should begin without any preconditions.

'Counterproductive'

The European Union's chief diplomat on Tuesday lamented Israel's green-light to expand the Gilo settlement and urged the government to reverse its decision.

"It is with deep regret that I learned today about the decision to advance in the plans for settlement expansion in east Jerusalem, with new housing units in Gilo," said Catherine Ashton, EU foreign policy chief.

"This plan should be reversed. Settlement activity threatens the viability of an agreed two-state solution and runs contrary to the Israeli-stated commitment to resume negotiations," Ashton told the European parliament.

She recalled that the Quartet of Middle East peacemakers - the EU, Russia, the UN and the US - have pleaded with Israelis and Palestinians to "refrain from provocative actions" if talks are to resume.

Richard Miron, spokesman for UN Mideast envoy Robert Serry, said the Israeli decision was "very concerning'' and ignored the Quartet's appeal.

"This sends the wrong signal at this sensitive time,'' he said.

Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton, US secretary of state, called Israel's decision to expand its settlement "counterproductive".

http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Libya after Gaddafi: Who's in charge?


Libya after Gaddafi: Who's in charge?

NTC fighter at rally in Tripoli, 12 September 2011The security structure is fragmented, with NTC fighters camped in Tripoli
With remnants of the Gaddafi regime restricted to a few last outposts, Libya's transitional authorities now face the challenge of running a country emerging from war.
The National Transitional Council (NTC), formed in the eastern city of Benghazi to lead the uprising, is gradually establishing itself in the capital, Tripoli, with ambitious plans.
It wants to form a new interim government by the end of September, and hold elections for a 200-strong national congress within eight months. The congress will then draft a constitution, paving the way for multi-party polls.
But power structures within Libya remain fractured, creating the potential for conflict as a wide range of groups, interests and allegiances jostle for position.
Competing for credit
The NTC will have to secure the co-operation of these groups to achieve its goals.
"They have a lot of challenges to overcome before they can get the wheels of government running smoothly," says Ahmad Fawzi, spokesman for the UN special adviser for Libya, Ian Martin.
"They are conscious of the fact that they need to be seen to be running the country from the capital, and we haven't seen that yet."
Most immediately, this may be a question of asserting authority over those who accumulated power on the ground during six months of conflict.
NTC chairman Mustafa Abdul Jalil and acting prime minister Mahmoud Jibril have now arrived in Tripoli but the brigades who conducted the military campaign were there weeks before.

Transition Timeline

  • New government within 10 days
  • Elect national congress in eight months
  • Referendum on new constitution within 90 days of congress meeting
  • Multi-party polls in 2013
An uprising within Tripoli was carefully planned to coincide with the assault led by seasoned Berber fighters from the Nafousa mountains and Misrata, but brigades from different regions have begun competing for credit for liberating the capital.
It is not clear when the brigades will disband, and some weapons have already gone missing.
The brigades are meant to answer to a Supreme Security Committee (SSC), a sprawling new body led by interim oil and finance minister Ali Tarhouni that also includes the police, the interior and defence ministries, and neighbourhood committees.
But the security structure is fragmented - cities have been running their own military affairs, volunteers soldiers are said to be reluctant to obey the national liberation army, and in some neighbourhoods, competing committees have sprung up.
Factions may also be divided. There were reports on Sunday that at least 12 people had been killed when two groups of anti-Gaddafi fighters clashed in the west in a dispute over the ownership of heavy weapons.
Fighters from Misrata, which suffered a brutal and lengthy siege by pro-Gaddafi forces, have begun to challenge NTC authority, reportedly refusing to turn over abandoned tanks.
Regional rivalries
The Misratans will be seeking recognition for their recent ordeal, while those in the far east and west will be seeking recognition for more long-running discrimination at the hands of the Gaddafi regime.
This could contribute to regional rivalries in the longer term, particularly once Libya's oil economy recovers and billions of dollars in revenue start to flow.
The uprising began in the east, and easterners have so far been over-represented in the NTC. Benghazi has nine members to Tripoli's five, and residents of the eastern city dominate the council's executive committee.

“Start Quote

The top echelon is being asked to stay at home - those who were responsible for gross violations of human rights have either disappeared or been killed ”
Ahmad FawziUN spokesman
They have been criticised for being slow to come to Tripoli, though this was at least partly due to security concerns.
Mr Jibril has promised that east, west "and even the cities still under siege, will be part of a new government", and the NTC says it could double in size to nearly 100 members once national liberation is achieved.
But even redressing the balance could cause tensions. In recent days there have been protests in Benghazi by people who say they are worried too much power will go to the capital.
Competition between regions is expected to eclipse any tribal, ethnic or cultural splits.
Tribal identities were at times played up by Col Gaddafi, but while they can be socially important, many analysts and transitional officials say they are unlikely to impact politically.
A transitional "covenant" published in August promises in its first article to protect the language rights and culture of the "Amazigh, Toubou and Touareg and other constituents of Libyan society".
But another potential source of tension is the division between "insiders" who remained in Libya during the Gaddafi era and the conflict, and "outsiders" who have come back from abroad.
"If there's going to be large proportion of outsiders I can see that could create a lot of resentment - the outsiders tend to be relatively rich," says Mohamed El-Doufani, an analyst at BBC Monitoring.
The close involvement of the West in the military campaign could reinforce this resentment, he adds.
"There will be suspicions as to whether they're talking on behalf of another country, or whether they are for the national interest."
Islamists and secularists
There could also be an ideological dimension, with growing talk of a divide between secular technocrats who studied and worked overseas, and Islamists who opposed Col Gaddafi's rule from within Libya.
Abdel Hakim Belhaj in Tripoli, 1 September 2011Abdel Hakim Belhaj, head of Tripoli's military council, has pledged to lay down arms
Most prominent among the secularists is Mr Jibril, who has studied and taught in the US and spent much of the conflict abroad, lobbying for the NTC.
Most prominent among the Islamists is Abdel Hakim Belhaj, a former leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, who was elected as head of Tripoli's military council against Benghazi's wishes.
Mr Jibril has denied any rift between him and Mr Belhaj, while Mr Belhaj has pledged to work for "a civil state that respects the law and rights", and to lay down his arms.
Yet despite all the possible faultlines, observers note a relative lack of infrastructural damage, an abundance of goodwill and the potential for Libyans to guide the transition themselves.
The UN's Ahmad Fawzi said he was "cautiously optimistic" after a five-day trip to Tripoli and Benghazi, and did not expect the kind of violent retribution seen in Iraq.
"The top echelon is being asked to stay at home," he said, while "those who were responsible for gross violations of human rights have either disappeared or been killed".
But others will be allowed to stay in place and work for the NTC's goals of elections, security and justice.
"It's a very mature approach to revolution," said Mr Fawzi.

http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

US poverty numbers hit record high

US poverty numbers hit record high

Census report shows 46 million people living below the American poverty line last year.


The poverty rate for blacks and Hispanics was much higher than for the overall population, the report said [AFP]


The US poverty rate hit its highest level since 1993 last year, with a record 46 million people living below the American poverty line, according to census data.

A government report released on Tuesday said the poverty rate rose for a third consecutive year to hit 15.1
per cent in 2010, up from 14.3 per cent a year earlier.

The US definition of poverty in 2010 was an annual income of $22,314 for a family of four, and $11,139 for a single person.

The survey showed struggles for the rest of Americans, with median annual household income falling 2.3 percent to $49,445.

However, the census report said there was no "statistically significant" change in inequality between 2009 and 2010 based on its index.

The poverty rate for blacks and Hispanics was much higher than for the overall population at 27.4 per cent and 26.6 per cent, respectively. Among regions, the South had the highest poverty rate at 16.9 per cent and the highest percentage without health insurance, 19.1 per cent.

The Census Bureau said the number of people country-wide without health insurance coverage rose to 49.9 million in 2010 from 49.0 million in 2009.

The report, showing the first full year since the recession officially ended in June 2009, supports the notion that Americans have been losing ground economically. It showed real median incomes fell 6.4 per cent from pre-recession levels in 2007 and were 7.1 per cent below the peak in 1999.

Underlying the census data was a rate of economic growth too weak to compensate for the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs from 2009 to 2010, as the recession officially ended but the jobless rate shot up from 9.3 per cent to 9.6 per cent.

Highest rate among rich nations

Ron Haskins, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said the report showed "the news on economic well-being in the US is not good," and that the trend is likely to continue.

"Given the widely accepted projections that both unemployment and in particular long-term unemployment will continue at high rates for the next several years, we can expect this pattern of continuing low income and high poverty rates for many years," Haskins said.

"Safety net programmes run by the federal and state governments are helping millions of families avoid poverty, but these programs could be subject to cuts at the federal and state level because of continuing deficit and debt problems".

The poverty rate increased for children under 18 to 22 per cent from 20.7 per cent in 2009.

The Children's Leadership Council, an advocacy group, called the news "unacceptable in America."

"We are paying the price for child poverty today, and we will pay the price for decades to come," the organisation said, calling for legislators to avoid further cuts to child welfare.

"The rising numbers of children living in poverty is a direct result of the choices made by political leaders who put billionaires before kids," the group said.

The US has the highest poverty rate among developed countries, according to the Paris-based Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.




http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/

Monday, September 12, 2011

NATO: 77 U.S. troops injured after Taliban hit Afghan coalition base

NATO: 77 U.S. troops injured after Taliban hit Afghan coalition base
By the CNN Wire Staff

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
NEW: All of the injured troops are Americans, an ISAF official says
At least two Afghan civilians are killed in the attack
Gen. John R. Allen: The attack says more about what the Taliban cannot do
"Their only ability to influence the battlefield" is often to go for a high-profile attack, he says

(CNN) -- All 77 NATO service members wounded in a Saturday attack against a coalition base in Afghanistan are U.S. troops, a spokeswoman for the International Security Assistance Force said Sunday.

Two Afghan civilians were killed and 25 others also were wounded in the attack, which occurred on the eve of the 10th anniversary of al Qaeda's attack on the United States on 9/11, U.S. Army Sgt. Lindsey Kibler said.

None of the injuries is life-threatening, ISAF said, and those wounded are expected to return to duties "shortly."

The truck bombing took place in the central-east province of Wardak, and those killed were Afghan laborers, said Shahidullah Shahid, the Wardak governor's spokesman.

"This attack was a high-profile attack. It was a pretty significant suicide vehicle bomb," Gen. John R. Allen, commander of coalition and U.S. forces in Afghanistan, told CNN's Suzanne Malveaux Sunday.

The Taliban claimed responsibility for the assault. NATO's International Security Assistance Force confirmed the attack was carried out by a Taliban suicide bomber.

Allen said the attack indicates "much more what the Taliban are unable to do" than what they are able to do.

"They have been ejected from the population in so many places around the country that their only ability to influence the battlefield on many occasions is simply to go for a high-profile attack. And that's how we view this particular attack," he said.

Shahid said three people had died, while NATO said two. NATO also said 77 of its personnel were injured, while the provincial government said only 10 people were injured.

It is not uncommon for a local government and NATO to have varying accounts of an attack.

The attacker was driving a truck carrying firewood and detonated his explosives at an entry point to the base, ISAF said in a statement.

"Most of the force of the explosion was absorbed by the protective barrier at the outpost entrance and though there were a significant number of injuries ... none is immediately life threatening," the statement said.

In a video issued by ISAF on Saturday, Allen spoke about the 9/11 anniversary and the long war, saying that while "there is still much work to be done" in the fight against Taliban militants, "we will prevail." He also praised the troops from the 49 nations serving in the ISAF coalition.

The protracted war began just a month after the al Qaeda terror network, sheltered at the time by the ruling Taliban militants, attacked the United States on September 11, 2001. U.S.-led forces kicked off Operation Enduring Freedom in October and ousted the Taliban.

Coalition and Afghan troops have been fighting the tenacious Taliban militants in the Afghan-Pakistani region.

Allen noted that "September 11 marks the 10th anniversary of an event that changed the world."

Ever since that day, he said, the troops have crippled insurgents and have honored the victims of terrorism worldwide. He said the coalition is committed to making sure Afghanistan is never again a safe haven for al Qaeda.

"You have helped the Afghan people build their nation, a democratic government and an ever-strengthening security force," he said, saying Afghanistan has made advances in security, economic development and governance.

The coalition death toll in the war is nearing 2,700, according to a CNN count, with the United States sustaining most of the casualties in Operation Enduring Freedom.

August was the deadliest month for U.S. forces in Afghanistan since the conflict began. Seventy-one American troops died in August, topping July 2010, when 65 troops died, according to the CNN tally.

The surge in U.S. deaths comes as NATO is drawing down and handing over security control to national forces. Some 10,000 U.S. troops are scheduled to depart by year's end, with all U.S. military personnel out of Afghanistan by the end of 2014.

CNN's Joe Sterling, Adam Levine, Matiullah Mati, Claudia Dominguez and Tom Evans contributed to this report.http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/

Sunday, September 11, 2011

Angry crowd turns on journalists reporting embassy attack in Egypt


Angry crowd turns on journalists reporting embassy attack in Egypt

From Ivan Watson, CNN
One Egyptian journalist is accused of being an Israeli spy
A producer working for CNN helps her to safety
Other journalists report similar experiences

Cairo (CNN) -- An angry crowd lingering near the Israeli embassy in Cairo after an attack on the building a day earlier turned on journalists reporting the incident Saturday, accusing at least one of being an Israeli spy.

As a CNN crew filmed the embassy from across the street, another crew from American public television -- led by Egyptian television producer Dina Amer -- approached the building.

The crew's Russian cameraman was preparing to film the embassy when a woman in the crowd began hurling insults at the TV team, Amer said.

"There was this older lady who decided to follow me and rally people against me," Amer recalled.

"She said 'you're a spy working with the Americans.' Then they swarmed me and I was a target."

A growing crowd surrounded Amer and her colleagues, as they tried to leave the scene.

Mohamed Fadel Fahmy, a producer working for CNN, rushed to help escort Amer through the angry crowd. But suddenly the two reporters were pinned against the railing of an overpass by young men who were accusing Amer of being an Israeli spy.

Yelling "I'm Egyptian," Fahmy managed to pull Amer another 10 meters down the road, until the pressure from the mob overwhelmed the pair.

Amer screamed as she and Fahmy were knocked to the ground and the crowd started to trample them.

Other CNN journalists tried to reach in to help, but were pushed back by a wall of angry men.

Fahmy lay on top of Amer, shielding her with his body.

"I was thinking, how powerless I was because there was no police to save us," Fahmy said. "I was worried that they were going to rape her."

At that moment, a student bystander named Mohammed el Banna called out to the journalists and pointed out a nearby car.

Somehow, Fahmy managed to carry Amer to the open door of the public television crew's car, where two of her female colleagues were waiting just a few feet away.

The mob pounded on the windows and tried to reach into the vehicle as the panicked reporters fumbled and struggled to get behind the steering wheel.

When Margaret Warner, a correspondent with the PBS program "Newshour" managed to get the vehicle moving away from the crowd, men threw stones at the departing vehicle.

Amer had few words to describe the terrifying ordeal.

"They were animals," she said.

Other Egyptian journalists told CNN they were also attacked Saturday while trying to report near the Israeli embassy.

Ahmed Aleiba, a correspondent with Egyptian state television, said he was pursued by civilians and soldiers.

"I had to run because obviously they were targeting journalists," Aleiba said in a phone call with CNN. "They attacked two other TV crews."

"I was in the car getting ready to film. A soldier knocked on the window with his stick and said 'if you don't leave by midnight your car will be destroyed,"" said Farah Saafan, a video journalist with the English-language newspaper Daily News Egypt.

Journalists have been targeted before in Cairo.

On February 2, dozens of journalists of different nationalities were beaten and pursued around the city while trying to report on pro-Mubarak demonstrations. The day descended into one of brutal street violence, as pro-regime supporters backed by men on horses and camels attacked opposition demonstrators on what became known as the "Battle of the Camel."

And CBS News correspondent Lara Logan suffered a brutal sexual assault in Tahrir Square while covering the celebrations that followed former President Hosni Mubarak's resignation on February 11.

On Saturday, as some journalists ran for their lives from the Israeli Embassy, the interim government was holding crisis talks with Egypt's ruling military council and top intelligence chief.

The emergency session concluded with a pledge to honor Egypt's international treaties and defend foreign embassies. The government also announced plans to re-activate the country's 30-year-old emergency law.

Application of the law had lapsed since the overthrow of Mubarak, according to a senior official in the National Security Directorate, who spoke to CNN on condition of anonymity.

One of the five measures announced after Saturday's crisis talks calls on authorities to make "media and political powers accountable for inciting security lapses."

"It's obvious that there is some sort of plan leading to military rule in this country," warned Egyptian state TV's Aleiba. "The next step will be martial law."http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/