LONDON – Britain’s Labor MP Stephen Timms praised Muslims for bringing back faith into Britain.“When parts of our society are so deeply secular, so hostile to the acknowledgment of God, I want today to express appreciation and thanks to Muslims in Britain for insisting on faith,” said the Minister for Business and Labour MP for East Ham at the Global Peace and Unity Event organized by Islam Channel last week. “(I want to thank Muslims) for helping put faith back today at the centre of Britain’s national life and debate in a way that it wasn’t for a very long time.
“You are part of the reason for that change, and I warmly welcome it,” he added.He urged Muslims to take up politics. “We need more people taking up politics from the starting point of faith. Because faith is the source of decent values (like) honesty, commitment to family, generosity, support for peace,” Timms said. “(We need such) decent values which the Muslim community shows in abundance.”“Those are the very values which we need in our politics, and which this event can help us to promote,” he added.In an earlier BBC program, Stephen Timms visited two mosques, two churches, a Hindu temple and a Sikh Gurudwara and highlighted the positive contribution the faith groups were making towards cohesion.The GPU event 2008 was supported by major Islamic organizations including the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) and British Muslim Forum (BMF). The event attracted more than 60,000 visitors last year with addresses from a number of prominent Islamic scholars.Awards were given to people in recognition of their outstanding contribution to society. Madeleine Bunting, a Guardian columnist and Associate Editor, was awarded the ‘Friends of Islam Media Award’ this year.
By Dr. Mozammel Haque
Saudi Gazette
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Friday, November 14, 2008
Ruling on praying in Sufi mosques
In the suburb where I live there is a Masjid that belongs to Sufis and another smaller Masjid belongs to them as well. Is it permissible to pray in it?.
Praise be to Allaah.
Do not pray with these Sufis in their zawiyahs, and beware of keeping company with them and mixing with them, lest you be affected by what has affected them. Try to pray in the mosque of a congregation who seek to follow the Sunnah and are keen to do so.
And Allaah is the Source of strength. May Allaah send blessings and peace upon our Prophet Muhammad and his family and companions. End quote.
Standing Committee for Academic Research and Issuing Fatwas
Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Baaz, Shaykh ‘Abd al-Razaaq ‘Afeefi, Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Ghadyaan, Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Qa’ood
Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, 3/18.
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Praise be to Allaah.
Do not pray with these Sufis in their zawiyahs, and beware of keeping company with them and mixing with them, lest you be affected by what has affected them. Try to pray in the mosque of a congregation who seek to follow the Sunnah and are keen to do so.
And Allaah is the Source of strength. May Allaah send blessings and peace upon our Prophet Muhammad and his family and companions. End quote.
Standing Committee for Academic Research and Issuing Fatwas
Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Baaz, Shaykh ‘Abd al-Razaaq ‘Afeefi, Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Ghadyaan, Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Qa’ood
Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, 3/18.
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Top Saudi Imam to visit Mauritius
Mauritius is to host the leading Imam of the Grand mosque in the Islamic holy city of Mecca. Abdul Rahman Ibn Abdul Aziz as-Sudais an-Najdi is scheduled to visit in January 2009.
Saudi Arabia newly appointed Ambassador to Mauritius, Mohammed Al-Ali, announced on Monday at a press briefing. He is also accredited to South Africa.
He has presented his letter of credence to the President of the Republic Sir Anerood Jugnauth and has also met various ministers like the Deputy Prime Minister Dr Ahmed Rashid Beebeejaun. He has visited the Islamic Cultural Centre.Mohammed Al-Ali, worked on the modalities of Sheik Sudais visit with Information and Communication Technology Minister Mohammed Asraf Ali Dulull, who has taken the initiative and wrote to the Saudi Embassy since July asking for Sheik Sudais to visit Mauritius.In the presence of ICC Chairman Abdus Samad Nazeer, Minister Dulull assured Al-Ali that everything will be organized the best possible way by the unanimous and deeply felt wish of the Muslims of Mauritius, to have the unique and solemn opportunity of welcoming an illustrious son of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
“Sheikh Sudais is well known personality to Muslims in Mauritius; not only those who have performed Umrah or Hajj as we liked his Quran’ recitations. Such a visit will not only go a long way towards cementing further the meaningful and purposeful relationships between two brotherly countries, but will also galvanize our religious togetherness, unity and fervour. I will chair a committee and we will see to it that he will never forget his visit to Mauritius and Insha Allah he will come again,” Dulull told.Dulull also praised the Saudi Arabian government for their continued efforts to help the Hajj and Umrah pilgrims and wished prosperity to the brothers and sisters of the Kingdom. Ambassador Al-Ali spoke of the possibility of Saudi TV 2 to be broadcast in Mauritius.
Yasine Mohabuth
Africa News reporter in Port Louis, Mauritius
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Saudi Arabia newly appointed Ambassador to Mauritius, Mohammed Al-Ali, announced on Monday at a press briefing. He is also accredited to South Africa.
He has presented his letter of credence to the President of the Republic Sir Anerood Jugnauth and has also met various ministers like the Deputy Prime Minister Dr Ahmed Rashid Beebeejaun. He has visited the Islamic Cultural Centre.Mohammed Al-Ali, worked on the modalities of Sheik Sudais visit with Information and Communication Technology Minister Mohammed Asraf Ali Dulull, who has taken the initiative and wrote to the Saudi Embassy since July asking for Sheik Sudais to visit Mauritius.In the presence of ICC Chairman Abdus Samad Nazeer, Minister Dulull assured Al-Ali that everything will be organized the best possible way by the unanimous and deeply felt wish of the Muslims of Mauritius, to have the unique and solemn opportunity of welcoming an illustrious son of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
“Sheikh Sudais is well known personality to Muslims in Mauritius; not only those who have performed Umrah or Hajj as we liked his Quran’ recitations. Such a visit will not only go a long way towards cementing further the meaningful and purposeful relationships between two brotherly countries, but will also galvanize our religious togetherness, unity and fervour. I will chair a committee and we will see to it that he will never forget his visit to Mauritius and Insha Allah he will come again,” Dulull told.Dulull also praised the Saudi Arabian government for their continued efforts to help the Hajj and Umrah pilgrims and wished prosperity to the brothers and sisters of the Kingdom. Ambassador Al-Ali spoke of the possibility of Saudi TV 2 to be broadcast in Mauritius.
Yasine Mohabuth
Africa News reporter in Port Louis, Mauritius
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Thursday, November 6, 2008
Muslim Minorities & Political Participation
Sheikh Mohamed El-Moctar El-Shinqiti
Profession: Director of the Islamic Center of South Plains, Lubbock, Texas
Date :Tuesday,Nov 4 ,2008
In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger.
Brothers and sisters, the session has already started. You can submit your questions. Please, make your questions short and clear so as to help us answer all your questions.
Yours, Islam Online Fatwa Editing Desk.
Question
Is it a duty upon Muslims living in the West to participate in the political life and what if the whole system of the state is in contrary with some of the teachings of Islam?
Answer
In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger. It is the duty upon Muslims living in the West and in any other place on earth to participate in the political life, and to contribute to the common good of their societies. If some of the aspects of the political system in the Western countries are in contrary with the teachings of Islam that is very normal. Even within the self-portrayed 'Islamic countries' there are many things that are in contradiction with the Islamic teachings. In both cases, committed Muslims need to be positive and to participate in the political life. If they cannot achieve all what they aspire to achieve, that is not a problem. We live in an imperfect world, and we need to be realistic, positive and optimistic. Almighty Allah wants us to do our best, no more no less.
Allah Almighty knows best.
Name
Hosam - United States
Profession
Question
Respected scholar, as we see the two USA candidates for presidency office tried their best in various ways to stay away from the Muslims' bloc and from any relation with Muslims. In light of this, how do you see this situation and the role of Muslims in this concern?
Answer
In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger. Politicians usually distance themselves from any people who might be a liability for their political ambitions, even if these people are the closest to them in race and faith. See, for example, how Barak Obama distanced himself from the man who was his spiritual and ideological guide for many years. When the two US candidates for the presidency office try to stay away from Muslims, this tells me about Muslims' political weakness more than about the candidates' character. Muslims in the US and everywhere need to understand the logic of politics. It is a power logic, not a charity logic after all, despite all the rhetoric of the candidates. The candidates will appreciate Muslim minorities only as much as Muslims build their own strengths, remedy their own weaknesses, and deepen their own presence and influence within their societies.
Allah Almighty knows best.
Name
Nafees -
Profession
Question
As-Salamu `Alaykum respected scholar. Some notable Muslim personalities like Imam Anwar Awalaki have clearly stated that voting in the US elections is haram, and that the argument that some scholars use about the 'lesser of the two evils' in fact leads to a greater evil - i.e. legitimizing a kufr system by participating in it. Is this rationale correct? and if not, how do you respond to it?
Answer
Wa `alaykum As-Salamu wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh.
In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger. I think this view is based on two false assumptions: the first one is that the current system in the West is a kufr (disbelief) system; the second is that this system needs Muslims' support to legitimize itself. On the first assumption, I would like to say that the liberal democratic system adopted in the West today is not a belief or a disbelief system; rather I call it an 'open space' system. This is a system based on liberty and justice for all, which implies the right for everyone to follow (or even create) his own moral and religious beliefs. On the second assumption, I would like to say that this system is not looking for a source of legitimacy outside itself. Therefore, it is better for Muslims to enter this open space and to present their moral and humane message, taking into account the many neighbors they have around them within that space, with all their different views and perceptions about the meaning of this life on earth.
Allah Almighty knows best.
Name
Murad - France
Profession
Student
Question
Salam, do you think after all what has been done to destroy Islam and Muslims' image in the West after 11 Sep, is it possible for Muslims to perform their political rights?
Answer
Wa `alaykum As-Salamu wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh.
In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger. The attempts to tarnish the image of Islam did not start with the 9-11 attacks, and will not stop in the future. In a world of conflict between the different worldviews and concepts about the meaning the human existence, you have to expect attacks from those who have different faiths, and attempts from them to discredit your faith. But you are doing the same things. There is no doubt that Islam is the final message from God and the only authentic message from Him that was not corrupted by human interventions. And it is a terrible loss for Western societies in general and American people in particular, that Islam was presented and represented to them the wrong way. However, Muslims need to focus on their own performance in this perpetual conflict of values and views, rather than deploring what others are doing against Islam.
Allah Almighty knows best.
In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful. All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger.
Brothers and sisters, we are so sorry for not answering all your questions because the time is over. We apologize for any inconvenience. Do keep in touch. Join us in coming sessions. Yours, Islam Online Fatwa Editing Desk.
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Profession: Director of the Islamic Center of South Plains, Lubbock, Texas
Date :Tuesday,Nov 4 ,2008
In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger.
Brothers and sisters, the session has already started. You can submit your questions. Please, make your questions short and clear so as to help us answer all your questions.
Yours, Islam Online Fatwa Editing Desk.
Question
Is it a duty upon Muslims living in the West to participate in the political life and what if the whole system of the state is in contrary with some of the teachings of Islam?
Answer
In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger. It is the duty upon Muslims living in the West and in any other place on earth to participate in the political life, and to contribute to the common good of their societies. If some of the aspects of the political system in the Western countries are in contrary with the teachings of Islam that is very normal. Even within the self-portrayed 'Islamic countries' there are many things that are in contradiction with the Islamic teachings. In both cases, committed Muslims need to be positive and to participate in the political life. If they cannot achieve all what they aspire to achieve, that is not a problem. We live in an imperfect world, and we need to be realistic, positive and optimistic. Almighty Allah wants us to do our best, no more no less.
Allah Almighty knows best.
Name
Hosam - United States
Profession
Question
Respected scholar, as we see the two USA candidates for presidency office tried their best in various ways to stay away from the Muslims' bloc and from any relation with Muslims. In light of this, how do you see this situation and the role of Muslims in this concern?
Answer
In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger. Politicians usually distance themselves from any people who might be a liability for their political ambitions, even if these people are the closest to them in race and faith. See, for example, how Barak Obama distanced himself from the man who was his spiritual and ideological guide for many years. When the two US candidates for the presidency office try to stay away from Muslims, this tells me about Muslims' political weakness more than about the candidates' character. Muslims in the US and everywhere need to understand the logic of politics. It is a power logic, not a charity logic after all, despite all the rhetoric of the candidates. The candidates will appreciate Muslim minorities only as much as Muslims build their own strengths, remedy their own weaknesses, and deepen their own presence and influence within their societies.
Allah Almighty knows best.
Name
Nafees -
Profession
Question
As-Salamu `Alaykum respected scholar. Some notable Muslim personalities like Imam Anwar Awalaki have clearly stated that voting in the US elections is haram, and that the argument that some scholars use about the 'lesser of the two evils' in fact leads to a greater evil - i.e. legitimizing a kufr system by participating in it. Is this rationale correct? and if not, how do you respond to it?
Answer
Wa `alaykum As-Salamu wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh.
In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger. I think this view is based on two false assumptions: the first one is that the current system in the West is a kufr (disbelief) system; the second is that this system needs Muslims' support to legitimize itself. On the first assumption, I would like to say that the liberal democratic system adopted in the West today is not a belief or a disbelief system; rather I call it an 'open space' system. This is a system based on liberty and justice for all, which implies the right for everyone to follow (or even create) his own moral and religious beliefs. On the second assumption, I would like to say that this system is not looking for a source of legitimacy outside itself. Therefore, it is better for Muslims to enter this open space and to present their moral and humane message, taking into account the many neighbors they have around them within that space, with all their different views and perceptions about the meaning of this life on earth.
Allah Almighty knows best.
Name
Murad - France
Profession
Student
Question
Salam, do you think after all what has been done to destroy Islam and Muslims' image in the West after 11 Sep, is it possible for Muslims to perform their political rights?
Answer
Wa `alaykum As-Salamu wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh.
In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger. The attempts to tarnish the image of Islam did not start with the 9-11 attacks, and will not stop in the future. In a world of conflict between the different worldviews and concepts about the meaning the human existence, you have to expect attacks from those who have different faiths, and attempts from them to discredit your faith. But you are doing the same things. There is no doubt that Islam is the final message from God and the only authentic message from Him that was not corrupted by human interventions. And it is a terrible loss for Western societies in general and American people in particular, that Islam was presented and represented to them the wrong way. However, Muslims need to focus on their own performance in this perpetual conflict of values and views, rather than deploring what others are doing against Islam.
Allah Almighty knows best.
In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful. All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger.
Brothers and sisters, we are so sorry for not answering all your questions because the time is over. We apologize for any inconvenience. Do keep in touch. Join us in coming sessions. Yours, Islam Online Fatwa Editing Desk.
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Hamas skeptical about change in US policy Hisham Abu Taha | Arab News
GAZA CITY: Hamas leaders yesterday voiced skepticism over any change in America’s policy in the Middle East and an end to Washington’s hostility toward the Palestinian movement after yesterday’s US election.
Israel Radio quoted a Hamas spokesman in Gaza, Fawzi Barhoum, as describing the choice between the Republican John McCain and his Democratic rival Barack Obama as one between two “awful options.”
Earlier yesterday, news reports quoted Khaled Meshaal, the exiled Hamas leader, as saying he was ready to hold talks with any elected US president.
“Hamas is ready for dialogue with any incoming US president .... Democrat Obama or Republican McCain,” Meshaal said.
“We are ready to deal with any presidential candidate, but we will always stick to our rights. We acknowledge that the United States is powerful, but we are more powerful in our territory.”
On Saturday, Hamas’ deposed Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh said the next US president should reverse the country’s current policy toward the Palestinians by lifting the embargo on the Gaza Strip and cutting back support for Israel.
Hamas, which seized the Gaza Strip more than a year ago after bloody fighting with its rival Fatah, is branded by Washington as a terrorist group.
Cairo talks
Rivalry between the two Palestinian groups has continued since then and Hamas yesterday threatened to boycott the reconciliation meetings in Cairo, if its members continue to be arrested in the West Bank. The Fatah-dominated Palestinian Authority rules the West Bank.
Hamas has reservations on the Egyptian reconciliation plan aimed at healing rifts between the two groups.
Another Palestinian group, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) said yesterday that it would participate in the Cairo talks independently and not as part of a Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) delegation.
Rabah Muhana, a senior PFLP leader, told reporters that there were difference on some points among the factions represented in the PLO
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Israel Radio quoted a Hamas spokesman in Gaza, Fawzi Barhoum, as describing the choice between the Republican John McCain and his Democratic rival Barack Obama as one between two “awful options.”
Earlier yesterday, news reports quoted Khaled Meshaal, the exiled Hamas leader, as saying he was ready to hold talks with any elected US president.
“Hamas is ready for dialogue with any incoming US president .... Democrat Obama or Republican McCain,” Meshaal said.
“We are ready to deal with any presidential candidate, but we will always stick to our rights. We acknowledge that the United States is powerful, but we are more powerful in our territory.”
On Saturday, Hamas’ deposed Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh said the next US president should reverse the country’s current policy toward the Palestinians by lifting the embargo on the Gaza Strip and cutting back support for Israel.
Hamas, which seized the Gaza Strip more than a year ago after bloody fighting with its rival Fatah, is branded by Washington as a terrorist group.
Cairo talks
Rivalry between the two Palestinian groups has continued since then and Hamas yesterday threatened to boycott the reconciliation meetings in Cairo, if its members continue to be arrested in the West Bank. The Fatah-dominated Palestinian Authority rules the West Bank.
Hamas has reservations on the Egyptian reconciliation plan aimed at healing rifts between the two groups.
Another Palestinian group, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) said yesterday that it would participate in the Cairo talks independently and not as part of a Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) delegation.
Rabah Muhana, a senior PFLP leader, told reporters that there were difference on some points among the factions represented in the PLO
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Monday, November 3, 2008
Bigotry and Islamophobia under the disguise of "freedom of Speech"
By Sadia Ali AdenOctober 20, 2008
"The Media has become an effective tool for prolonging the psychological terrorization of the American people. American citizens must be vigilant in not allowing hate mongering interest groups, such as the producers of this DVD, to subvert such values as liberty, peace, and justice for all."
The heartrending reality of bigotry and Islamophobia in today's American environment is overwhelming. The Islamophobes use the media as a propaganda tool to poison the minds of the American people under the disguise of "freedom of speech." This was evident when Mr. Glen Sheller, editor of The Columbus Dispatch newspaper's editorial page, defended the Dispatch's distribution of the fear mongering DVD "Obsession," which was intended to instill fear in the hearts and minds of the unsuspecting American people. While we should relish and strive to benefit from our freedom of expression without fear or favor, we should also be mindful that the way we use our "freedom of speech" speaks volumes about us. The gate keepers of public forums should remain neutral moderators and not compromise their ability to objectively protect the principles of this American value. Once reason is overshadowed, and objectivity diluted with hate, positive public discourse becomes more elusive.
Writer Abukar Arman warns us in an article titled "DVD's makers used newspapers to spread hatred," published in The Columbus Dispatch: "Gone are the days when the perpetrators of hate would march with banners that explicitly express their negative views of other groups. Today, hate messages and propaganda often are camouflaged as talk-radio punditry, political speeches and infomercials." Attesting to his legitimate concern was the campaign, in September of this year (during the sacred month of Ramadan), to distribute 28 million copies of the Obsession DVD as a free insert into 70 newspapers in a number of key battle-ground states.
There is a fine line between the healthy use of freedom of speech, and employing such "freedom" to advance bigotry and Islamophobia. The Media has become an effective tool for prolonging the psychological terrorization of the American people. American citizens must be vigilant in not allowing hate mongering interest groups, such as the producers of this DVD, to subvert such values as liberty, peace, and justice for all. I am strongly opposed to newspaper editors, like Mr. Sheller, allowing themselves to be used to advance the agenda of hate mongering Islamophobes. As a mother who must carefully shelter her child from dangers lurking in the dark, I also feel the need to protect our cherished Constitutional principles, and the hard earned image of the better of the "two Americas."
I fully understand the pain and anxiety caused by these hate mongering, Islamophobic groups who try to cloak their agendas under the umbrella of "freedom of speech". They are far more detrimental to the health and welfare of America than meets the eye.
The promulgation of hatred and bigotry does not lead to positive public discourse. A case in point is the statement that I received from an American (Caucasian) woman who shared Mr. Sheller's interpretation of "freedom of speech." She said to me, "With that scarf on your head, you are a disgrace to every American women." Surprised and saddened, I responded, "This is ironic, because I am a proud American woman and I am far from being disgraced."
In such an atmosphere that fosters so much pain and fear, a more healthy journalism – one that is balanced and fair - must be exerted. I support freedom of speech, but not at the expense of truth and justice! I realize that to achieve such a task takes dedication, perseverance and true integrity. May Mr. Sheller, and others who share his views in defense of the "Obsession" DVD, learn this lesson before it's too late.
by courtesy Sadia Ali Aden
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Source: Maanhadal.com
"The Media has become an effective tool for prolonging the psychological terrorization of the American people. American citizens must be vigilant in not allowing hate mongering interest groups, such as the producers of this DVD, to subvert such values as liberty, peace, and justice for all."
The heartrending reality of bigotry and Islamophobia in today's American environment is overwhelming. The Islamophobes use the media as a propaganda tool to poison the minds of the American people under the disguise of "freedom of speech." This was evident when Mr. Glen Sheller, editor of The Columbus Dispatch newspaper's editorial page, defended the Dispatch's distribution of the fear mongering DVD "Obsession," which was intended to instill fear in the hearts and minds of the unsuspecting American people. While we should relish and strive to benefit from our freedom of expression without fear or favor, we should also be mindful that the way we use our "freedom of speech" speaks volumes about us. The gate keepers of public forums should remain neutral moderators and not compromise their ability to objectively protect the principles of this American value. Once reason is overshadowed, and objectivity diluted with hate, positive public discourse becomes more elusive.
Writer Abukar Arman warns us in an article titled "DVD's makers used newspapers to spread hatred," published in The Columbus Dispatch: "Gone are the days when the perpetrators of hate would march with banners that explicitly express their negative views of other groups. Today, hate messages and propaganda often are camouflaged as talk-radio punditry, political speeches and infomercials." Attesting to his legitimate concern was the campaign, in September of this year (during the sacred month of Ramadan), to distribute 28 million copies of the Obsession DVD as a free insert into 70 newspapers in a number of key battle-ground states.
There is a fine line between the healthy use of freedom of speech, and employing such "freedom" to advance bigotry and Islamophobia. The Media has become an effective tool for prolonging the psychological terrorization of the American people. American citizens must be vigilant in not allowing hate mongering interest groups, such as the producers of this DVD, to subvert such values as liberty, peace, and justice for all. I am strongly opposed to newspaper editors, like Mr. Sheller, allowing themselves to be used to advance the agenda of hate mongering Islamophobes. As a mother who must carefully shelter her child from dangers lurking in the dark, I also feel the need to protect our cherished Constitutional principles, and the hard earned image of the better of the "two Americas."
I fully understand the pain and anxiety caused by these hate mongering, Islamophobic groups who try to cloak their agendas under the umbrella of "freedom of speech". They are far more detrimental to the health and welfare of America than meets the eye.
The promulgation of hatred and bigotry does not lead to positive public discourse. A case in point is the statement that I received from an American (Caucasian) woman who shared Mr. Sheller's interpretation of "freedom of speech." She said to me, "With that scarf on your head, you are a disgrace to every American women." Surprised and saddened, I responded, "This is ironic, because I am a proud American woman and I am far from being disgraced."
In such an atmosphere that fosters so much pain and fear, a more healthy journalism – one that is balanced and fair - must be exerted. I support freedom of speech, but not at the expense of truth and justice! I realize that to achieve such a task takes dedication, perseverance and true integrity. May Mr. Sheller, and others who share his views in defense of the "Obsession" DVD, learn this lesson before it's too late.
by courtesy Sadia Ali Aden
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Source: Maanhadal.com
Friday, October 31, 2008
Saturday, October 18, 2008
Haweeney tujineysa salaadda jimcaha
Amina Wadud oo tujinaysa jameeco sanadkii 2005 BBC Somali
Ururka Islaamka ee Britian oo ku casuumay qof dumar ah oo muslimka Mareykanka ah inay tujiso salaadda Jimacaha ee maanta ee ka dhacaysa magaalada Oxford ee waddankan Britian.
Tallaabadan ayaa mid keeni doonta carro xoog leh oo ay ka soo horjeestaan qaar ka mid ah muslimka waddankan.
Warbixinta Haweeneyda
Professor Amina Wadud oo cilmiga Islaamka ka dhigta jaamicadda Virginia Commonwealth University, ayaa dhalisay buuq weyn markii laba sano ka hor ay sidan oo kale Imam u noqotay oo ay tujisay dad badan magaalada New York.
Masaajidyo dhawr ah ayaa diiday in xilligaasi oo ahayd 2005 ay haweeneydaasi salaad jameeco ah ku tujiso halkaasi, iyadoo markii danbe loo wareejiyay dhisme goob kaniisad oo ku taala magaalada New York.
Qaar badan oo ka mid ah muslimiinta caalamka ayaa cambaareeyay tallaabadaasi oo ay ku tilmaameen wax ka soo horjeeda sharciga Islaamka. http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Ururka Islaamka ee Britian oo ku casuumay qof dumar ah oo muslimka Mareykanka ah inay tujiso salaadda Jimacaha ee maanta ee ka dhacaysa magaalada Oxford ee waddankan Britian.
Tallaabadan ayaa mid keeni doonta carro xoog leh oo ay ka soo horjeestaan qaar ka mid ah muslimka waddankan.
Warbixinta Haweeneyda
Professor Amina Wadud oo cilmiga Islaamka ka dhigta jaamicadda Virginia Commonwealth University, ayaa dhalisay buuq weyn markii laba sano ka hor ay sidan oo kale Imam u noqotay oo ay tujisay dad badan magaalada New York.
Masaajidyo dhawr ah ayaa diiday in xilligaasi oo ahayd 2005 ay haweeneydaasi salaad jameeco ah ku tujiso halkaasi, iyadoo markii danbe loo wareejiyay dhisme goob kaniisad oo ku taala magaalada New York.
Qaar badan oo ka mid ah muslimiinta caalamka ayaa cambaareeyay tallaabadaasi oo ay ku tilmaameen wax ka soo horjeeda sharciga Islaamka. http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Sorrowful condition of the unbelieversCommentary by Sayyid Qutb
In the name of God, the Lord of Grace, the Ever Merciful
Around their necks We have put chains, reaching up to their chins, so that their heads are forced up. And We have set a barrier before them and a barrier behind them, and We enshrouded them in veils so that they cannot see. It is all the same to them whether you warn them or you do not warn them: they will not believe. You can truly warn only such a one as follows this reminder and who stand in awe of the Lord of Grace although He is beyond the reach of human perception. To such, then, give the happy news of God’s forthcoming forgiveness and a generous reward. It is We who will bring the dead back to life. We record whatever (deeds) they send ahead, as well as the traces they leave behind. We keep an account of all things in a clear record. Cite for them, as a case in point, the people of a township to which messengers came. (Ya Sin: 36: 8-13)
At this point, the surah draws an image of their psychological condition, and we see them with chains around their necks, barriers separating them from divine guidance, and with a cover over their eyes depriving them of the ability to see: “Around their necks We have put chains, reaching up to their chins, so that their heads are forced up. And We have set a barrier before them and a barrier behind them, and We enshrouded them in veils so that they cannot see.” Their hands are fastened with chains to their necks, placed under their chins, which has the effect of lifting up their heads such that they cannot see what is in front of them. Moreover, there are walls and barriers both in front of and behind them, which means that even if they were released from these chains, they still could not see through the barriers. Furthermore, the covers placed over their eyes makes it even more impossible for them to see.
Although this image is fierce and sharp, we actually do encounter people of this ilk. When you see them overlooking the plain truth that is in front of them, you feel as if there is a wall separating them from it. Although their hands are not chained and nor are their heads forced up, you nonetheless feel that their souls and minds are turned away from the truth, unable to see guidance. It is as if there are barriers preventing them from approaching it. Such were the people who turned deaf ears to the Qur’an and who received it with irrational denial as it put before them its argument and proof.
This is when the Qur’an is itself a irrefutable proof.
“It is all the same to them whether you warn them or you do not warn them: they will not believe.” Their case is settled. God knows that faith will not penetrate their hearts. No warning will ever benefit a heart that has steeled itself against divine guidance, and barracked its approach. Warnings do not create hearts; it only alerts a heart that is alive, ready to receive guidance: “You can truly warn only such a one as follows this reminder and who stands in awe of the Lord of Grace although He is beyond the reach of human perception. To such, then, give the happy news of God’s forthcoming forgiveness and a generous reward.”
Most probably, the ‘reminder’ in this instance refers to the Qur’an. A person who follows the Qur’an and fears God despite not seeing Him is the one who benefits by the warning. It is as if the warning has been given to such people only and the Prophet (peace be upon him) directed it to them alone, even though he addressed it to all people. Since the others are prevented from receiving the warning, it looks as if it is given only to those who follow the Qur’an and fear God. Such people deserve to be given good news. Hence the Prophet is told to give them ‘the happy news of God’s forthcoming forgiveness and a generous reward.’ They need the forgiveness of any sin they commit providing they do not persist in doing it, and they deserve the generous reward for fearing God and following what He has revealed. These two aspects go hand in hand: When a person truly fears God, he or she is certain to follow His guidance and implement the system He has laid down.
At this point, the truth of resurrection is emphasized, together with the reckoning that ignores nothing: “It is We who will bring the dead back to life. We record whatever (deeds) they send ahead, as well as the traces they leave behind. We keep an account of all things in a clear record.” Bringing the dead back to life has always been an issue fraught with argument, of which we will see several types in this surah. They are warned here that whatever they do and whatever effects their deeds cause are written down, and nothing is forgotten. It is God Almighty who brings the dead back to life, records their actions and reckons everything. All this, then, is done in the perfect way that fits anything done by God. As for the ‘clear record’ and similar descriptions such as ‘the imperishable tablet’, these are most probably references to God’s perfect knowledge that transcends time and place.
Having presented the issues of revelation and resurrection in the form of a factual statement, the surah now presents them again in narrative form so as to touch hearts with a story about the fate of those who persist in denying the truth: “Cite for them, as a case in point, the people of a township to which messengers came.”
The Qur’an does not mention which township this was or who were its people. Different reports suggest different towns and cities, but there is no real benefit in trying to establish its identity. The fact that the Qur’an neither identifies it nor mentions its location does not detract from the import of the story. It is a city to which God sent two messengers, just as He sent Moses and his brother Aaron to Pharaoh and his nobles. The people of the city rejected their message, accusing them of lying. God supported His two messengers with a third, confirming that they were truly His messengers. All three of them again presented their message, saying to the people: “We are messengers who have been sent to you.”
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Around their necks We have put chains, reaching up to their chins, so that their heads are forced up. And We have set a barrier before them and a barrier behind them, and We enshrouded them in veils so that they cannot see. It is all the same to them whether you warn them or you do not warn them: they will not believe. You can truly warn only such a one as follows this reminder and who stand in awe of the Lord of Grace although He is beyond the reach of human perception. To such, then, give the happy news of God’s forthcoming forgiveness and a generous reward. It is We who will bring the dead back to life. We record whatever (deeds) they send ahead, as well as the traces they leave behind. We keep an account of all things in a clear record. Cite for them, as a case in point, the people of a township to which messengers came. (Ya Sin: 36: 8-13)
At this point, the surah draws an image of their psychological condition, and we see them with chains around their necks, barriers separating them from divine guidance, and with a cover over their eyes depriving them of the ability to see: “Around their necks We have put chains, reaching up to their chins, so that their heads are forced up. And We have set a barrier before them and a barrier behind them, and We enshrouded them in veils so that they cannot see.” Their hands are fastened with chains to their necks, placed under their chins, which has the effect of lifting up their heads such that they cannot see what is in front of them. Moreover, there are walls and barriers both in front of and behind them, which means that even if they were released from these chains, they still could not see through the barriers. Furthermore, the covers placed over their eyes makes it even more impossible for them to see.
Although this image is fierce and sharp, we actually do encounter people of this ilk. When you see them overlooking the plain truth that is in front of them, you feel as if there is a wall separating them from it. Although their hands are not chained and nor are their heads forced up, you nonetheless feel that their souls and minds are turned away from the truth, unable to see guidance. It is as if there are barriers preventing them from approaching it. Such were the people who turned deaf ears to the Qur’an and who received it with irrational denial as it put before them its argument and proof.
This is when the Qur’an is itself a irrefutable proof.
“It is all the same to them whether you warn them or you do not warn them: they will not believe.” Their case is settled. God knows that faith will not penetrate their hearts. No warning will ever benefit a heart that has steeled itself against divine guidance, and barracked its approach. Warnings do not create hearts; it only alerts a heart that is alive, ready to receive guidance: “You can truly warn only such a one as follows this reminder and who stands in awe of the Lord of Grace although He is beyond the reach of human perception. To such, then, give the happy news of God’s forthcoming forgiveness and a generous reward.”
Most probably, the ‘reminder’ in this instance refers to the Qur’an. A person who follows the Qur’an and fears God despite not seeing Him is the one who benefits by the warning. It is as if the warning has been given to such people only and the Prophet (peace be upon him) directed it to them alone, even though he addressed it to all people. Since the others are prevented from receiving the warning, it looks as if it is given only to those who follow the Qur’an and fear God. Such people deserve to be given good news. Hence the Prophet is told to give them ‘the happy news of God’s forthcoming forgiveness and a generous reward.’ They need the forgiveness of any sin they commit providing they do not persist in doing it, and they deserve the generous reward for fearing God and following what He has revealed. These two aspects go hand in hand: When a person truly fears God, he or she is certain to follow His guidance and implement the system He has laid down.
At this point, the truth of resurrection is emphasized, together with the reckoning that ignores nothing: “It is We who will bring the dead back to life. We record whatever (deeds) they send ahead, as well as the traces they leave behind. We keep an account of all things in a clear record.” Bringing the dead back to life has always been an issue fraught with argument, of which we will see several types in this surah. They are warned here that whatever they do and whatever effects their deeds cause are written down, and nothing is forgotten. It is God Almighty who brings the dead back to life, records their actions and reckons everything. All this, then, is done in the perfect way that fits anything done by God. As for the ‘clear record’ and similar descriptions such as ‘the imperishable tablet’, these are most probably references to God’s perfect knowledge that transcends time and place.
Having presented the issues of revelation and resurrection in the form of a factual statement, the surah now presents them again in narrative form so as to touch hearts with a story about the fate of those who persist in denying the truth: “Cite for them, as a case in point, the people of a township to which messengers came.”
The Qur’an does not mention which township this was or who were its people. Different reports suggest different towns and cities, but there is no real benefit in trying to establish its identity. The fact that the Qur’an neither identifies it nor mentions its location does not detract from the import of the story. It is a city to which God sent two messengers, just as He sent Moses and his brother Aaron to Pharaoh and his nobles. The people of the city rejected their message, accusing them of lying. God supported His two messengers with a third, confirming that they were truly His messengers. All three of them again presented their message, saying to the people: “We are messengers who have been sent to you.”
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Netherlands: Interest in imam training
The Dutch imam and Islam courses are going well. Currently about 150 students are taking the course in one of three institutions. The number of students three years after the courses were started is therefore similar to those of the various courses for Christian pastoral care, according to data from the ministry of integration Friday.
The course can be taken at the Free University, the University of Leiden and at the InHolland College. The course forms a basis for graduate to continue on their studies within the Islamic community for the position of imam. Graduates can also get work as a Muslim spiritual chaplain, as spiritual attendant in prisons, hospitals and in the military, as social workers, teachers or policy assistant. Source: Telegraaf (Dutch)
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
The course can be taken at the Free University, the University of Leiden and at the InHolland College. The course forms a basis for graduate to continue on their studies within the Islamic community for the position of imam. Graduates can also get work as a Muslim spiritual chaplain, as spiritual attendant in prisons, hospitals and in the military, as social workers, teachers or policy assistant. Source: Telegraaf (Dutch)
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Witches could get posthumous pardon for execution
Campaigners are seeking a posthumous pardon for the men and women who were executed as British witches centuries ago.
They have collected a set of eight grave "miscarriages of justice" with which they hope to persuade Justice Secretary Jack Straw on the issue.
More than 400 people were put to death in England for alleged witchcraft, and over 2,000 were executed in Scotland, before the 1735 Witchcraft Act put an end to the trials, they said.
Their bid to obtain justice for the victims follows an official pardon granted earlier this year by the Swiss Government to Anna Goeldi, beheaded in 1782 and regarded as the last person executed as a witch in Europe.
The family behind Angels, the Hallowe'en costume supplier, came up with the idea for the petition and turned to historian Dr John Callow to collect some of the victims' stories.
Dr Callow, editor of Witchcraft and Magic in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Europe, said it was now time to recognise the witch trials as "most dangerous and tragic" fabrications.
"Today we are well aware that these individuals were neither capable of harmful magic nor in league with the devil," he said.
"At the time, poverty was endemic - charity was breaking down and aggressive begging, accompanied by threats or curses, was common.
"Crops failed, butter failed to churn or cattle sickened and the blame was often settled on witches.
"Against such a background, judiciaries across the British Isles were compelled to act.
"The results were perjury and delusion on a grand scale, resulting in nothing less than legalised murder."
Notorious cases mentioned in the petition include that of Agnes Sampson, executed in East Lothian, Scotland, in 1591.
Considered a healer, she acted as midwife to the community of Nether Keith but, following a near shipwreck involving King James VI of Scotland, became one of many Scottish women accused of witchcraft.
Although she initially resisted torture, even before James VI at Holyrood House, she finally confessed and was burned at the stake.
In another case, 80-year-old clergyman John Lowes was forced to conduct his own funeral service before he was hanged in Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, in 1645.
The octogenarian was seen as too attached to the Catholic religion in a strongly Reformed area and was forced to walk for days and nights by the witch hunter Matthew Hopkins until confessing.
Emma Angel, head of Angels Fancy Dress, said: "We decided to launch this initiative because we feel that it is time that sinister associations held by a minority of people about witches and Hallowe'en were tackled head-on.
"We were gobsmacked to discover that though the law was changed hundreds of years ago and society had moved on, the victims were never officially pardoned.
"The Swiss have led the way on this one, and I really hope that we can encourage our government to follow suit."
he campaign aims to make people realise that witches never really existed, and the fears of the past - such as criticism of Hallowe'en as a sinister celebration of the occult - deserve no place in the present.
The petition, officially launched tomorrow, will be presented to the Ministry of Justice and its Scottish counterpart on Hallowe'en.
It can be seen at www.pardonthewitches.com/content/witches
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
They have collected a set of eight grave "miscarriages of justice" with which they hope to persuade Justice Secretary Jack Straw on the issue.
More than 400 people were put to death in England for alleged witchcraft, and over 2,000 were executed in Scotland, before the 1735 Witchcraft Act put an end to the trials, they said.
Their bid to obtain justice for the victims follows an official pardon granted earlier this year by the Swiss Government to Anna Goeldi, beheaded in 1782 and regarded as the last person executed as a witch in Europe.
The family behind Angels, the Hallowe'en costume supplier, came up with the idea for the petition and turned to historian Dr John Callow to collect some of the victims' stories.
Dr Callow, editor of Witchcraft and Magic in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Europe, said it was now time to recognise the witch trials as "most dangerous and tragic" fabrications.
"Today we are well aware that these individuals were neither capable of harmful magic nor in league with the devil," he said.
"At the time, poverty was endemic - charity was breaking down and aggressive begging, accompanied by threats or curses, was common.
"Crops failed, butter failed to churn or cattle sickened and the blame was often settled on witches.
"Against such a background, judiciaries across the British Isles were compelled to act.
"The results were perjury and delusion on a grand scale, resulting in nothing less than legalised murder."
Notorious cases mentioned in the petition include that of Agnes Sampson, executed in East Lothian, Scotland, in 1591.
Considered a healer, she acted as midwife to the community of Nether Keith but, following a near shipwreck involving King James VI of Scotland, became one of many Scottish women accused of witchcraft.
Although she initially resisted torture, even before James VI at Holyrood House, she finally confessed and was burned at the stake.
In another case, 80-year-old clergyman John Lowes was forced to conduct his own funeral service before he was hanged in Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, in 1645.
The octogenarian was seen as too attached to the Catholic religion in a strongly Reformed area and was forced to walk for days and nights by the witch hunter Matthew Hopkins until confessing.
Emma Angel, head of Angels Fancy Dress, said: "We decided to launch this initiative because we feel that it is time that sinister associations held by a minority of people about witches and Hallowe'en were tackled head-on.
"We were gobsmacked to discover that though the law was changed hundreds of years ago and society had moved on, the victims were never officially pardoned.
"The Swiss have led the way on this one, and I really hope that we can encourage our government to follow suit."
he campaign aims to make people realise that witches never really existed, and the fears of the past - such as criticism of Hallowe'en as a sinister celebration of the occult - deserve no place in the present.
The petition, officially launched tomorrow, will be presented to the Ministry of Justice and its Scottish counterpart on Hallowe'en.
It can be seen at www.pardonthewitches.com/content/witches
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
He has been given money to help him get married – should he accept it?
One of my relatives sent me a large amount of money on the occasion of my marriage, with the intention of helping me. Should I accept it or is it better to be proud and be content with what I have?.
Praise be to Allaah.
There is nothing wrong with accepting it if you were not hoping for it, and reciprocating in a suitable manner or making du’aa’ for him, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever does you a favour, then respond in kind, and if you cannot find anything to give him, then make du’aa’ for him (and keep doing so) until you think that you have done enough.”
Narrated by Abu Dawood and al-Nasaa’i.
And Allaah is the Source of strength.
Al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah li’l-Buhooth al-‘Ilmiyyah wa’l-Ifta, 16/171
IslamQA© 1997-2008 : 81.55
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Praise be to Allaah.
There is nothing wrong with accepting it if you were not hoping for it, and reciprocating in a suitable manner or making du’aa’ for him, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever does you a favour, then respond in kind, and if you cannot find anything to give him, then make du’aa’ for him (and keep doing so) until you think that you have done enough.”
Narrated by Abu Dawood and al-Nasaa’i.
And Allaah is the Source of strength.
Al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah li’l-Buhooth al-‘Ilmiyyah wa’l-Ifta, 16/171
IslamQA© 1997-2008 : 81.55
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Her brother is in jail and her paternal uncles are in another country. Who can be her wali
I am a revert but with Muslim family in other countries (i.e. my paternal uncles). My father is deceased which is why my brother and I were raised no Muslim. My brother is also a revert now but is in jail. I live with my mom and she is unmarried and is Christian. Her father (a nonmuslim) is the only mahram I have in this country besides my brother who is in jail. In this situation, who is my wali? Would it be the imam at the masjid I attend, or would it be one of my paternal uncles? Or is it still my brother?.
Praise be to Allaah.
Firstly:
We praise Allaah for having guided you to Islam, and we ask Him to increase you in faith, knowledge, steadfastness and guidance.
Secondly:
The woman’s wali is her father, then his father (i.e., her grandfather), then her son, then his son (i.e., her grandson) [this applies if she has sons], then her full brother, then her half-brother through her father only, then the sons of her full brother, then the sons of her half-brother through her father, then her paternal uncles, then their sons, then the father’s paternal uncles, then the ruler. Al-Mughni (9/355).
The grandfather who has the right of guardianship is the grandfather on the father’s side. The mother’s father cannot be a wali. Based on this, your wali is your Muslim brother; the fact that he is in jail does not prevent him from being a wali. It is possible to contact him and visit him, and at that time he can delegate someone to do the marriage contract for you on his behalf. If that is not possible, then your wali is your paternal uncle, and it does not matter that he is in another country. He can delegate someone to do the marriage contract for you, or the marriage contract can be done by modern means such as the telephone and internet.
See also the answer to question no. 2201 and 105531.
We ask Allaah to bless you with a righteous husband and righteous offspring.
And Allaah knows best.
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Praise be to Allaah.
Firstly:
We praise Allaah for having guided you to Islam, and we ask Him to increase you in faith, knowledge, steadfastness and guidance.
Secondly:
The woman’s wali is her father, then his father (i.e., her grandfather), then her son, then his son (i.e., her grandson) [this applies if she has sons], then her full brother, then her half-brother through her father only, then the sons of her full brother, then the sons of her half-brother through her father, then her paternal uncles, then their sons, then the father’s paternal uncles, then the ruler. Al-Mughni (9/355).
The grandfather who has the right of guardianship is the grandfather on the father’s side. The mother’s father cannot be a wali. Based on this, your wali is your Muslim brother; the fact that he is in jail does not prevent him from being a wali. It is possible to contact him and visit him, and at that time he can delegate someone to do the marriage contract for you on his behalf. If that is not possible, then your wali is your paternal uncle, and it does not matter that he is in another country. He can delegate someone to do the marriage contract for you, or the marriage contract can be done by modern means such as the telephone and internet.
See also the answer to question no. 2201 and 105531.
We ask Allaah to bless you with a righteous husband and righteous offspring.
And Allaah knows best.
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Home Secretary forced into 'humiliating retreat' over detention plans
Emergency legislation to bring the 42-day limit into force will lie on file, Smith said
Plans to hold terror suspects for up to 42 days without charge were dramatically abandoned last night after the proposals were overwhelmingly defeated in the House of Lords.
Plans to hold terror suspects for up to 42 days without charge were dramatically abandoned last night after the proposals were overwhelmingly defeated in the House of Lords.
In an emergency statement to MPs last night, Jacqui Smith announced a major U-turn, confirming she would pull the hugely contentious plans out of the Counter Terrorism Bill.
She backtracked on a key plank of Gordon Brown's legislative programme after peers inflicted a crushing defeat on the Government, voting by 309 to 118 – a majority of 191 – to reject any attempt to increase the current 28-day limit on detention.
The defeat was one of the largest in the Lords since Labour came to power, as ministers, including the former Labour Lord Chancellors Lord Irvine and Lord Falconer, rebelled to throw out the detention powers. Ms Smith said an emergency bill reintroducing the 42-day limit would be kept on file in case of a national crisis. Amid rowdy scenes she condemned Conservatives and Liberal Democrats for voting against the measure. But opposition MPs rounded on the Government, for executing a humiliating U-turn. Ms Smith said: "Those who have voted against these measures both in this House and in the other place are predominately from the two opposition parties. They should take responsibility for the defeat of this sensible and proportionate measure.
But Chris Huhne, the Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, retorted: "Whatever the Home Secretary says, this was a crushing defeat for the Government. It did not just lose the vote in the Lords, it lost the argument and is undergoing a humiliating retreat."
Dominic Grieve, the shadow Home Secretary, attacked legislation "put forward in such a way that smacks of mere political posturing and gimmicks."
Shami Chakrabarti, director of the pressure group Liberty, added: "Liberty has been overwhelmed by public and parliamentary support for our campaign against this divisive measure. If this or any other future government tried again... we will be waiting."
The Home Office climbdown came amid warnings that a defeat in the Upper House would merely open the way to a humiliating fresh rebellion in the House of Commons on the issue.
MPs and campaigners said the Bill would run into fierce opposition if ministers attempted to defy the Lords and tried to reintroduce the 42-day plan in the Commons. The planned extension of detention was carried in the Commons by a majority of just nine votes despite a rebellion by 36 Labour MPs after Democratic Unionist and Ulster Unionist MPs swung behind MPs.
But privately, ministers have been warned that wafer-thin majority had been cut still further, with the loss of Labour MPs in Glasgow East and Glenrothes and the departure from the Commons of the London Mayor Boris Johnson, who did not vote in June's division.
Lord Dear, the former West Midlands chief constable and crossbench peer, led calls to remove 42 days from the Bill, condemning the move as "a shabby charade" designed to look tough on terrorism. He said: "There is almost universal opposition to what the Government proposes.
It almost beggars belief that any administration could embark on such a course."
Lord Falkoner, the former Labour Lord Chancellor, said it was "fanciful" to argue that the plans would aid the fight against terrorism. Baroness Pauline Neville-Jones, the shadow Security Minister, said extending detention without charge was "unnecessary, undesirable and unworkable". Lord Thomas of Gresford, the Liberal Democrat frontbencher, condemned plans to give MPs a vote to trigger the extended detention powers as a "farce". He said: "That's not just unconstitutional, it's contemptible." But Lord Carlisle, the Liberal Democrat peer and the Government's independent reviewer of anti-terror law, insisted the change was needed to help police disrupt terrorist plots.
He said: "The authorities in this country have been fantastically successful in the disruptions that they have performed. I believe that, putting it at its lowest, many hundreds of lives have been saved by the authorities."
Lord Tebbit, the former Conservative cabinet minister seriously injured in the IRA bomb attack on the Grand Hotel in Brighton, said the Tories would "rue the day" if they helped defeat the 42-day plan.
He told peers: "How exactly would they go about coming back to Parliament and asking Parliament to grant those powers?"
By Ben Russell
The Independent
http://islaamdoon.blogspot.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)